listen to Lets Go Blues Radio on iTunes!

subscribe to the podcast

It is currently Sun Mar 29, 2015 11:38 am

Board index » Let's Go Blues » St. Louis Blues Discussion

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 10:08 am 
Offline
Hockey God
Hockey God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:29 am
Posts: 6599
Location: Selling Air Bombays--for kids who want to coach
Kris Russell was put on regular waivers. No reason given, but I did see where they mentioned that for Leopold to come back, they would have to clear a roster spot. Just speculation but maybe this is the first step in that?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 2:34 pm 
Offline
3rd Line Grinder
3rd Line Grinder

Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 2:42 pm
Posts: 102
I might be in the minority here but I would much rather have Kris Russell in the note than Leopold any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

_________________
Remember,
Amateurs built the ark ....
Professionals built the Titanic


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 4:29 pm 
Offline
Hockey God
Hockey God

Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 8:02 am
Posts: 7860
Location: Long Island, NY
I'd rather have Rob Scuderi. Cup experience and all that good stuff.

_________________
LGB sponsor of Ian Cole 2011-2012
LGB sponsor of Gary Bettman's Pink Slip 2013
LGB sponsor of Dmitrij Jaskin 2013-2014
LGB sponsor of Ian Cole (again) 2014-2015


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 4:31 pm 
Offline
Hockey God
Hockey God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:29 am
Posts: 6599
Location: Selling Air Bombays--for kids who want to coach
Dallas and Le sacre Bleu are out of the running for Vinny.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 4:39 pm 
Offline
Hockey God
Hockey God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:29 am
Posts: 6599
Location: Selling Air Bombays--for kids who want to coach
Vinny's a Flyer.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 4:52 pm 
Offline
Hockey God
Hockey God

Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 8:02 am
Posts: 7860
Location: Long Island, NY
Source? He can't sign anywhere until Friday.

_________________
LGB sponsor of Ian Cole 2011-2012
LGB sponsor of Gary Bettman's Pink Slip 2013
LGB sponsor of Dmitrij Jaskin 2013-2014
LGB sponsor of Ian Cole (again) 2014-2015


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 4:56 pm 
Offline
LGB Booster - Yellow
LGB Booster - Yellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 1:41 am
Posts: 4512
Location: St. Louis, MO
It is becoming more and more likely that the Blues will be a worse team this year and not a better one.

_________________
dhabums wrote:
You and your buddies here are a joke and most of this site knows it.


Sponsor of Having A Real Good Time, Happy Pony, and all those who suffer from being right all the time.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:32 pm 
Offline
3rd Line Grinder
3rd Line Grinder
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:59 pm
Posts: 191
Per the Twitter machines of LeBrun and Dreger, he signs with the Flyers for 5 years, 4.5 mil per. The demand for more years scared everyone off.

I didn't figure they would make a whimper in free agency, but after they pussy footed around at the draft, it's getting tough to stay patient.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:42 pm 
Offline
Hockey God
Hockey God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:29 am
Posts: 6599
Location: Selling Air Bombays--for kids who want to coach
glen a richter wrote:
Source? He can't sign anywhere until Friday.


http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck- ... 15395.html

Quote:
The Philadelphia Flyers began the day among the top three teams in the Vincent Lecavalier Derby. But the free-agent center’s demands were too rich for the Detroit Red Wings, and the Dallas Stars later confirmed they were out of the running as well.

The last team standing was the Flyers, who put Vincent Lecavalier in orange and black with a 5-year, $22.5 million deal for a $4.5 million cap hit – making him the second-highest paid forward on the team behind Scott Hartnell ($4.75 million.)

As a straight one-for-one upgrade over Danny Briere, it’s a win for the Flyers. But it’s more complicated than that.

There’s going to be a lot of attention paid to the other salaries on the Flyers, because the team began the day with just $4.18 million in cap space, per Cap Geek. That’s without a goalie to complement Steve Mason. That’s with new contracts due to Claude Giroux, Brayden Schenn, Sean Couturier and (if they keep him) Kimmo Timonen next summer.

(Wait … the Flyers might overspend at other positions and try to go goaltending on the cheap? It’s like the 1990s never ended!)

One imagines Braydon Coburn’s $4.5 million cap hit, and three remaining contract years, will be shipped out to compensate. His name was being bandied about at the NHL Draft, with the Edmonton Oilers a specific target.

Here’s Broad Street Hockey’s take on the cons for the Vinny deal:

The deal puts the Flyers right back over the salary cap. They had $4.18 million in space before the deal, and they still need to sign a starting or tandem starting goaltender. This is probably where the Braydon Coburn trade talk from the weekend comes into play, but I'd still rather trade Andrej Meszaros for a bag of pucks to get some cap savings. Once the season starts, Chris Pronger's LTIR relief will help as well. There's also a full no-move clause in the deal, because Lecavalier was going to get that from just about any team at this stage of his career. High-powered free agents get NMCs.

Why the Flyers for Vinny? They came close to the 5 years at $5 million he was looking for and play in the Eastern Conference. (Hey, he can knock off some dough from the price tag, getting $32.667 million over the next 14 years from the Tampa Bay Lightning.) His versatility at forward means he could play up with Claude Giroux or as a second-line center.

Why Vinny for the Flyers? They wanted a second line center with size. They wanted some veteran leadership. And let’s face it: There’s never been a big name that Ed Snider didn’t covet, whether or not it made fiscal or strategic sense.

Does this make sense? Again, they did have a need at forward, although the solution didn’t necessarily have to be a 33-year-old and a 5-year contract. But their needs were so much more glaring on the back end that this signing feels abjectly irresponsible.

Yes, they’re going to sell a metric ton of Lecavalier Flyers gear; perhaps that’ll offset the cost of having Steve Mason, Affordable Other Goaltender and a questionable defense on the backend.

We much preferred last summer’s Philadelphia Flyers Star-[expletiving].

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 8:54 pm 
Offline
Hockey God
Hockey God
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:18 pm
Posts: 17108
I'm afraid we're turning into the Ottawa Senators of the WC. Sure, some nice players, but no money players.

Yeah, 27 is a smooth, skilled defenseman. But he's a pansy.
91 gave us all broners, but he's a pansy
etc, etc, etc


PUSSIES. All of 'em except perhaps Backes and Reaves.

_________________
Official '14-'15 sponsor of the $17.8+ trillion U.S. national debt.
Past Sponsorships: '13-'14 another season of bitter disappointment; '13: communism; 11-'12: Vlad Sobotka and fake, drunken lesbianism; 10-'11: Ryan Reaves, Bo Derek's cans, Willow Palin, and the new Lightning logo; 09-'10: the epic destruction of the Politics Forum; 08-'09: Sandy Miller


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:16 am 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:52 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: Tampa FL
goon attack wrote:
I'm afraid we're turning into the Ottawa Senators of the WC. Sure, some nice players, but no money players.

Yeah, 27 is a smooth, skilled defenseman. But he's a pansy.
91 gave us all broners, but he's a pansy
etc, etc, etc


PUSSIES. All of 'em except perhaps Backes and Reaves.


This year's training camp should be run exlusively by Twist, Chase, and the ghosts of Gassoff and Durbano.

_________________
2014-2015 LGB sponsor of Kevin Shattenkirk
2013-2014 LGB sponsor of Brendan Morrow
2013 LGB sponsor of Jamie Langenbrunner
2011-2012 LGB sponsor of Jamie Langenbrunner
2008-2009 LGB sponsor of David Backes


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:36 am 
Offline
All-Star
All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 9:03 pm
Posts: 2126
Location: St. Louis, MO
Nyghtewynd wrote:
It is becoming more and more likely that the Blues will be a worse team this year and not a better one.



I'm so glad you are here...

_________________
Official Chatzy Sponsor Extraordinaire - Just wait till we score four...

Official Sponsor of FlashChat.. why am I alone still?

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:00 am 
Online
Hall Of Fame
Hall Of Fame

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:43 am
Posts: 2978
Nyghtewynd wrote:
It is becoming more and more likely that the Blues will be a worse team this year and not a better one.


Why? Free agency doesn't even start for a week and very few big trades have occurred.

_________________
2010-2011 Official LGB Sponsor of Kevin Shattenkirk


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 9:54 am 
Offline
3rd Line Grinder
3rd Line Grinder
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:14 am
Posts: 108
Location: Illinois
Leopold signed extension, 2 years 4.5 million

_________________
2012-2013 official sponsor of Vladimir Sobotka
2013-2014 official sponsor of Ryan Miller
2014-2015 official sponsor of Alexander Steen


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 3:35 pm 
Offline
3rd Line Grinder
3rd Line Grinder

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 3:52 am
Posts: 108
Location: Biel, Bern
Can someone please explain me: What is the thing with the buy-outs? If a team buys out a player, does this free-up cap-space? If yes, does the bought-out players not count agains the cap-hit at all, or is there a minimum amount?

edit: ...and is it just me or is there an unusual amout of buy-outs this year?

_________________
2014-2015 LGB Sponsor of Paul Stastny


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:19 pm 
Offline
Hockey God
Hockey God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:29 am
Posts: 6599
Location: Selling Air Bombays--for kids who want to coach
Jaykay wrote:
Can someone please explain me: What is the thing with the buy-outs? If a team buys out a player, does this free-up cap-space? If yes, does the bought-out players not count agains the cap-hit at all, or is there a minimum amount?

edit: ...and is it just me or is there an unusual amout of buy-outs this year?


The NBA has a similar buy out policy and it seems like more teams are going the route of trying to rid themselves of those stupid contracts that were en vogue a few years back. Thankfully the Blues weren't a part of that craze. But yes, basically the team has to pay the contract in full over time. I believe the player has to clear waivers, as well. Once this is done, it frees up all cap space that the contact had previously occupied. After next season, teams will have two buyouts instead of just one.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:35 pm 
Offline
3rd Line Grinder
3rd Line Grinder

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 3:52 am
Posts: 108
Location: Biel, Bern
dmiles2186 wrote:
Jaykay wrote:
Can someone please explain me: What is the thing with the buy-outs? If a team buys out a player, does this free-up cap-space? If yes, does the bought-out players not count agains the cap-hit at all, or is there a minimum amount?

edit: ...and is it just me or is there an unusual amout of buy-outs this year?


The NBA has a similar buy out policy and it seems like more teams are going the route of trying to rid themselves of those stupid contracts that were en vogue a few years back. Thankfully the Blues weren't a part of that craze. But yes, basically the team has to pay the contract in full over time. I believe the player has to clear waivers, as well. Once this is done, it frees up all cap space that the contact had previously occupied. After next season, teams will have two buyouts instead of just one.


thank you. so my next question is: why is there even a cap? i basically do not care, because sports is just about money - in every sport, btw. somehow i think, teams like the flyers, just ship out the ones who sucked, and ship in the next big contracted :doh: apparently, you just need to have the bankroll to do so.

so, if the owners want to ruin by themselves let them have their fun. the players surely also will have their fun, and we will have spectacular stories and headlines :aaaa: there's always a new owner group buying a bankrupted franchise :facepalm: ...but why do you need a cap then?

_________________
2014-2015 LGB Sponsor of Paul Stastny


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:15 pm 
Online
Hall Of Fame
Hall Of Fame

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:43 am
Posts: 2978
Jaykay wrote:
dmiles2186 wrote:
Jaykay wrote:
Can someone please explain me: What is the thing with the buy-outs? If a team buys out a player, does this free-up cap-space? If yes, does the bought-out players not count agains the cap-hit at all, or is there a minimum amount?

edit: ...and is it just me or is there an unusual amout of buy-outs this year?


The NBA has a similar buy out policy and it seems like more teams are going the route of trying to rid themselves of those stupid contracts that were en vogue a few years back. Thankfully the Blues weren't a part of that craze. But yes, basically the team has to pay the contract in full over time. I believe the player has to clear waivers, as well. Once this is done, it frees up all cap space that the contact had previously occupied. After next season, teams will have two buyouts instead of just one.


thank you. so my next question is: why is there even a cap? i basically do not care, because sports is just about money - in every sport, btw. somehow i think, teams like the flyers, just ship out the ones who sucked, and ship in the next big contracted :doh: apparently, you just need to have the bankroll to do so.

so, if the owners want to ruin by themselves let them have their fun. the players surely also will have their fun, and we will have spectacular stories and headlines :aaaa: there's always a new owner group buying a bankrupted franchise :facepalm: ...but why do you need a cap then?


The cap still prevents how much a team can spend on its active roster. A team can't just spend unlimited money on the 20 that dress each night even with the buyouts.

_________________
2010-2011 Official LGB Sponsor of Kevin Shattenkirk


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:51 am 
Offline
Hockey God
Hockey God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:29 am
Posts: 6599
Location: Selling Air Bombays--for kids who want to coach
Lebrun tweeted that the Blues 'kicked the tires' on Bozak but that Bozak's looking for a 5 year deal. Several other teams in the mix.

I'm not sure I see Bozak here, but fact is, the Blues are doing their research on a lot of guys so it's encouraging that they're trying to add some forwards to the mix.

I also read that Lecavalier told them their presentation was one of the best, even though he chose Philly.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The Offseason Thread
PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:09 am 
Offline
Hall Of Fame
Hall Of Fame
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 3:00 pm
Posts: 4759
Location: Phi Alpha
Jaykay wrote:
Can someone please explain me: What is the thing with the buy-outs? If a team buys out a player, does this free-up cap-space? If yes, does the bought-out players not count agains the cap-hit at all, or is there a minimum amount?

edit: ...and is it just me or is there an unusual amout of buy-outs this year?


My understanding as to why there are more of them this offseason is that with the lockout a team is afforded a certain number of "compliance buyouts" to come to terms with the new salary cap structure put in place by the lockout. In other words, each team has a certain number of guys they can ostensibly "buy out for free" and not have their cap hit still count against the team. Normally when a team buys a guy out they still get a cap hit (albeit a lower one) from the guy for the length of the contract. I think the Isles are still being hit with Yashin's IIRC.

That's why you saw Gomez, et al, getting bought out immediately after the lockout. It was a "free" buy out. This offseason you're just seeing more of the same.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Board index » Let's Go Blues » St. Louis Blues Discussion

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cardsfan04, Google [Bot], Portland Blues and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group