After their first line, they have Franzen...and that's really it...nothing else scares me. Detroit is hardly the offensive powerhouse they were in the past.Hullie wrote:Detroit did regain its depth they lacked from a season ago
Zetterberg-Datsyuk-Holmmstrom
Franzen-Filppula-Bertuzzi
Cleary-Modano-Hudler
Miller-Helm-Eaves
Filpula's best year was only 40 pts and that was a couple years ago...he had 35 pts. last year.
Bertuzzi has only been around 40 pts. the past few years.
Cleary's best year was 42 pts....and he had 34 pts. last year.
Hudler? The most goals he has had in a season is 5...and that was in '07-'08.
Modano? He only had 30 pts. last year and his numbers have decreased significantly each of the past three years...and he just turned 40.
If we are saying 40 pts. is the measure of a good depth player, which that seems to be what you are saying, then the Blues and Wings have similar depth because they each have the same number of players from last year's roster who scored over 40 pts. last season, with six players each.
Between 30pts. and 39 pts.? The Blues have 3 players and the Wings have 2 from last season.
Obviously Detroit is a superior offensive club to the Blues right now, primarily because of Zetterburg and Datsyuk. Those two guys run the show and a player or two like that is what the Blues are missing and what Blues fans have been screaming for management to acquire. They are hopeful that Perron, Boyes, Backes, Berglund, etc. crank up the goal total this year, which could happen...but it might not.
I don't think anyone would say that St. Louis has good offensive "depth". So I don't see how you would think Detroit has "good depth". A great first line, yes, but great depth? Meh...I don't think it's anything spectacular or scary like they used to have. But maybe they'll be better than their numbers are trending...hopefully not.
I give a shit. Anytime I have a chance to research Red Wings flaws, I certainly give a shit.I know no one here gives a shit. lol. I did this more for myself so thank you.