Moderator: LGB Mods



Topshelf331 wrote:Bad move for the leafs. Why would you do this when you just started the major rebuild?



section319 wrote:I don't know two late 1st round draft picks and a 2nd for a guy who scored more goals then anyone on the team this year.


Leedog wrote:So this is St. Louis Blues discussion, how? J/K.
Had they signed him to an offer sheet, wouldn't they have given up a 1,2, and 3? Why would they give up a 1, 2, and 1?

cprice12 wrote:What I don't understand is why Boston, who is a cup contender, would give up Kessel for guys who won't make an impact, if ever, for years. Boston is a cup contender now. You'd think they would have traded Kessel for a guy or two that could help their team this year. Sure, they'll enjoy the picks in the draft when they get them, but that doesn't help them this year, or next year even. I guess they could always trade one of those first rounders to pick up a guy at the deadline to improve their club. We'll see.



Leedog wrote:My point is they gave up more in the trade than they woulda via offer sheet, if I understand correctly. The 1 and 2 are consistant, but the trade yielded a second #1 instead of a #3.


210 wrote:section319 wrote:I don't know two late 1st round draft picks and a 2nd for a guy who scored more goals then anyone on the team this year.
Toronto still sucks...next year's pick will be top 15 easy.


210 wrote:cprice12 wrote:What I don't understand is why Boston, who is a cup contender, would give up Kessel for guys who won't make an impact, if ever, for years. Boston is a cup contender now. You'd think they would have traded Kessel for a guy or two that could help their team this year. Sure, they'll enjoy the picks in the draft when they get them, but that doesn't help them this year, or next year even. I guess they could always trade one of those first rounders to pick up a guy at the deadline to improve their club. We'll see.
They couldn't get him under the cap...plus the fact he is a first class arse in the locker room made it an easy decision to not sign him.

cprice12 wrote:210 wrote:cprice12 wrote:What I don't understand is why Boston, who is a cup contender, would give up Kessel for guys who won't make an impact, if ever, for years. Boston is a cup contender now. You'd think they would have traded Kessel for a guy or two that could help their team this year. Sure, they'll enjoy the picks in the draft when they get them, but that doesn't help them this year, or next year even. I guess they could always trade one of those first rounders to pick up a guy at the deadline to improve their club. We'll see.
They couldn't get him under the cap...plus the fact he is a first class arse in the locker room made it an easy decision to not sign him.
I understand that, but if I'm Boston, I want at least one player in return who can help my cup contending team this year.
As of right now, Boston just got worse for this season.



Return to St. Louis Blues Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 2 guests