Conklin or Mason

Discuss the St. Louis Blues, the NHL, or anything hockey.

Moderator: LGB Mods

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby Battra » Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:55 am

Personally, (obviously I'm late), I'm concerned about Mason.

Right now he's starting off like he did in his last year in Nashville, after he stole the job from Voukun.
User avatar
Battra
2nd Line Scorer
2nd Line Scorer
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:34 pm
Location: St. Louis City

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby strocklen083 » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:07 am

Battra wrote:Personally, (obviously I'm late), I'm concerned about Mason.

Right now he's starting off like he did in his last year in Nashville, after he stole the job from Voukun.

How do you figure??? And BTW, last night's game doesn't count. Mason kept that game managable, to the best of his ability until shit fell apart late in the 2nd. Other than that, he's GAA has been pretty solid, we just weren't able to score any goals against ATL or LA. The PHX game was a complete defensive breakdown that ended with a BS goal that shouldn't have ever counted in the first place.

It's WAY to early to be pressing any panic button or drawing comparisons between his performances. He was piss poor when he took over in Nashville. I wouldn't categorize him as piss poor this year by any means.
User avatar
strocklen083
All-Star
All-Star
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:04 pm
Location: Sec. 316

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby SIU LAW » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:08 am

Battra wrote:Personally, (obviously I'm late), I'm concerned about Mason.

Right now he's starting off like he did in his last year in Nashville, after he stole the job from Voukun.


What?
User avatar
SIU LAW
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 8683
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:26 am
Location: Hockey God Party Room

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby Battra » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:30 am

Ok...Ok...

I don't think 3.20 GAA is good. So far, I'm hearing the same things we've heard about goalies in the past that didn't stick...the team played poorly in front of him...those goals weren't his fault...

This is precisely what I was worried about going into this season...Would Chris Mason repeat last year, or would he repeat the year previous?
User avatar
Battra
2nd Line Scorer
2nd Line Scorer
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:34 pm
Location: St. Louis City

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby Battra » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:33 am

SIU LAW wrote:
Battra wrote:Personally, (obviously I'm late), I'm concerned about Mason.

Right now he's starting off like he did in his last year in Nashville, after he stole the job from Voukun.


What?


The year Chris Mason stole the job from Voukun:
40 1 4 2342 93 5 5 2.38 24 11 4 1151 0.925
Nice.

The year after:
51 1 0 2692 130 5 4 2.90 18 22 6 1148 0.898

Notice a drop in performance there?

The year Chris Mason stole the job from Legace:
57 1 0 3215 129 7 6 2.41 27 21 7 1415 0.916

This year:
5 0 0 281 15 1 0 3.20 1 3 1 135 0.900

Early I know...but this is what happened in Nashville 2 years ago.
User avatar
Battra
2nd Line Scorer
2nd Line Scorer
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:34 pm
Location: St. Louis City

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby SIU LAW » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:33 am

Using your own two eyes and common sense should help you see that Mason’s play has not been the issue.
User avatar
SIU LAW
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 8683
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:26 am
Location: Hockey God Party Room

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby Battra » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:36 am

SIU LAW wrote:Using your own two eyes and common sense should help you see that Mason’s play has not been the issue.


Ahh..

The common sense tact. If that's the best argument you have there's no point in continuing.
User avatar
Battra
2nd Line Scorer
2nd Line Scorer
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:34 pm
Location: St. Louis City

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby SIU LAW » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:38 am

Battra wrote:
SIU LAW wrote:Using your own two eyes and common sense should help you see that Mason’s play has not been the issue.


Ahh..

The common sense tact. If that's the best argument you have there's no point in continuing.


WTF?

Why you getting so dismissive if someone tells you to beyond the stats and actually watch the game and critically think about what is going on?

It doesn’t take a learned hockey mind to evaluate Mason’s performance thus far.

Have you actually seen these games with your own two eyes? Yes or no?
User avatar
SIU LAW
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 8683
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:26 am
Location: Hockey God Party Room

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby kodos » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:43 am

Conklin would have won this game.
Image
User avatar
kodos
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 11889
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:05 pm

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby Battra » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:50 am

SIU LAW wrote:
Battra wrote:
SIU LAW wrote:Using your own two eyes and common sense should help you see that Mason’s play has not been the issue.


Ahh..

The common sense tact. If that's the best argument you have there's no point in continuing.


WTF?

Why you getting so dismissive if someone tells you to beyond the stats and actually watch the game and critically think about what is going on?

It doesn’t take a learned hockey mind to evaluate Mason’s performance thus far.

Have you actually seen these games with your own two eyes? Yes or no?


Yes I have watched games. I have been to games, thank you.

I get dismissive because when one uses the common sense tact, it's shows that any conclusion I come to, would be stupid, if it differs from yours.

I have evaluated it, and I see it differently.

What does that mean to you?

I have concerns that he's going to falter, like he did in Nashville, and those concerns are being shown in the results.

Conklin, seems to be largely unaffected by this 'shoddy play' of the Blues.
User avatar
Battra
2nd Line Scorer
2nd Line Scorer
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:34 pm
Location: St. Louis City

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby SIU LAW » Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:58 am

Battra wrote:Conklin, seems to be largely unaffected by this 'shoddy play' of the Blues.


Wow.

Conklin has played TWO full games. Two wins.

Both he and Mason had shaky 1st periods in the Swedish games, but came out with wins.

Conklin’s other win (and only other full game) was against the Ducks and the Blues played great. I think most would argue that was the performance of the Blues this year.

Outside of the Detroit start, Mason has been solid in every game and kept the games a lot closer than they should have been, despite some poor play or poor offensive production by the Blues.

How in the hell you can make a case that Mason’s play is “a concern” blows me away.

That’s not taking anything from Conks, he has been good. I hope continues to play well. But right now, Mason has given the team no reason to demote him.
User avatar
SIU LAW
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 8683
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:26 am
Location: Hockey God Party Room

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby DaDitka » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:02 am

SIU LAW wrote:
Battra wrote:Conklin, seems to be largely unaffected by this 'shoddy play' of the Blues.


Wow.

Conklin has played TWO full games. Two wins.

Both he and Mason had shaky 1st periods in the Swedish games, but came out with wins.

Conklin’s other win (and only other full game) was in a game against the Ducks that the Blues played great. I think most would argue that was the performance of the Blues this year.

Outside of the Detroit start, Mason has been solid in every game and kept the games a lot closer than they should have been, despite some poor play or poor offensive production by the Blues.

How in the hell you can make a case that Mason’s play is “a concern” blows me away.

That’s not taking anything from Conks, he has been good. I hope continues to play well. But right now, Mason has given the team no reason to demote him.



:plusplus:


I was one who had concerns about Mason comming into the season (didn't know if he coudl do it again), but he's been pretty solid this season IMO.
Image

2012-2013 Official LGB Sponsor of Patrik 'Bulan' Berglund
User avatar
DaDitka
Hall Of Fame
Hall Of Fame
 
Posts: 2800
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:21 pm
Location: sailing with the Captain

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby Battra » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:04 am

SIU LAW wrote:
Battra wrote:Conklin, seems to be largely unaffected by this 'shoddy play' of the Blues.


Wow.

Conklin has played TWO full games. Two wins.

Both he and Mason had shaky 1st periods in the Swedish games, but came out with wins.

Conklin’s other win (and only other full game) was against the Ducks and the Blues played great. I think most would argue that was the performance of the Blues this year.

Outside of the Detroit start, Mason has been solid in every game and kept the games a lot closer than they should have been, despite some poor play or poor offensive production by the Blues.

How in the hell you can make a case that Mason’s play is “a concern” blows me away.

That’s not taking anything from Conks, he has been good. I hope continues to play well. But right now, Mason has given the team no reason to demote him.


You seem to have skipped over why I was dismissive. I see.

I seem to be hearing the same things that were said about Manny Legace last year...oh the team wasn't playing as well in front of him...etc.

Oh the team played so much better in front of Conks.

Does this not sound familiar to you?

(This has been coming up over and over for the last oh...well when did the lock out end?)

If you think 1-3-1 is not a concern, fine. I do.

1-3-1...vs 2-0.

Hmm.

You said the blues play poorly in front of Mason, but they play better in front of Conks.

Right?
User avatar
Battra
2nd Line Scorer
2nd Line Scorer
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:34 pm
Location: St. Louis City

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby cprice12 » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:09 am

Battra wrote:
SIU LAW wrote:
Battra wrote:
SIU LAW wrote:Using your own two eyes and common sense should help you see that Mason’s play has not been the issue.


Ahh..

The common sense tact. If that's the best argument you have there's no point in continuing.


WTF?

Why you getting so dismissive if someone tells you to beyond the stats and actually watch the game and critically think about what is going on?

It doesn’t take a learned hockey mind to evaluate Mason’s performance thus far.

Have you actually seen these games with your own two eyes? Yes or no?


Yes I have watched games. I have been to games, thank you.

I get dismissive because when one uses the common sense tact, it's shows that any conclusion I come to, would be stupid, if it differs from yours.

I have evaluated it, and I see it differently.

What does that mean to you?

I have concerns that he's going to falter, like he did in Nashville, and those concerns are being shown in the results.

Conklin, seems to be largely unaffected by this 'shoddy play' of the Blues.


The problem is you seem to be basing your opinion on stats alone...and stats rarely tell the whole story, especially with goaltending.
With goalies, their stats can be heavily influenced by the play of the team around them.

Therefore, actually analyzing his play instead of just looking at the stats, would give you a better idea of how well Mason has played. Hence the "common sense" comment.

I'm not sure how actually analyzing Mason's play, instead of focusing solely on stats, can be criticized. It's the best way to evaluate any player.

So, you say you have watched the games...if so, then would you say he is a victim of the way the team is playing around him, or is he actually playing as bad as his stats are saying right now?
Official LGB Sponsor of T.J. Oshie
Image
Image
User avatar
cprice12
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 19278
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Center Ice

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby SIU LAW » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:09 am

Battra wrote:You seem to have skipped over why I was dismissive. I see.


I really didn't think it was worth arguing with you on petty comments like this...

Battra wrote:I get dismissive because when one uses the common sense tact, it's shows that any conclusion I come to, would be stupid, if it differs from yours.

I have evaluated it, and I see it differently.

What does that mean to you?


...but if you want me to, I would be glad to do so.

There is nothing wrong with having a different opinion, but I also think there comes a time when it is obvious that a person’s opinion is pretty ignorant based on the actual games themselves.

I’m sure if you took a poll, an overwhelmingly majority would find your opinion…excuse the colorfulness…pretty f-ing stupid.
Last edited by SIU LAW on Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:13 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
SIU LAW
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 8683
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:26 am
Location: Hockey God Party Room

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby SIU LAW » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:11 am

Battra wrote:1-3-1...vs 2-0.

Hmm.

You said the blues play poorly in front of Mason, but they play better in front of Conks.

Right?


Are you really saying that the Blues have played poorly because of the goalie that was or was not in front of them for each particular game?

Right now you are trying to assign trends based on what is currently coincidence. This is where "common sense" comes in.
User avatar
SIU LAW
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 8683
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:26 am
Location: Hockey God Party Room

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby Sweetred95ta » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:11 am

SIU LAW wrote:
Battra wrote:But right now, Mason has given the team no reason to demote him.

:plusplus: Mason wasn't pulled last night due to the fact he was playing bad. It was purely a coaching tactic to try and change the motivation of the team.
I love hockey. Period.
User avatar
Sweetred95ta
2nd Line Scorer
2nd Line Scorer
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:25 am
Location: Arnold, MO

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby cprice12 » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:13 am

Battra wrote:Conklin, seems to be largely unaffected by this 'shoddy play' of the Blues.


The Blues played a GREAT game vs. the Ducks. They soundly beat them up and down the rink and really limited their good scoring chances.
Conklin was good in the game, but the Blues played well in front of him. He didn't have to steal the game for an sloppy Blues team that night.

Are you sure you have been watching these games? :lol:
Official LGB Sponsor of T.J. Oshie
Image
Image
User avatar
cprice12
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 19278
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Center Ice

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby SIU LAW » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:15 am

Also, do I sense a little crying on how Manny was done wrong by the Blues?

Mason didn’t steal the job. Manny was given every opportunity to succeed and to pull his head out of his ass, and he was clearly the victim of his own BS and bad play.
User avatar
SIU LAW
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 8683
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:26 am
Location: Hockey God Party Room

Re: Conklin or Mason

Postby Battra » Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:33 am

cprice12 wrote:
Battra wrote:
SIU LAW wrote:
Battra wrote:
SIU LAW wrote:Using your own two eyes and common sense should help you see that Mason’s play has not been the issue.


Ahh..

The common sense tact. If that's the best argument you have there's no point in continuing.


WTF?

Why you getting so dismissive if someone tells you to beyond the stats and actually watch the game and critically think about what is going on?

It doesn’t take a learned hockey mind to evaluate Mason’s performance thus far.

Have you actually seen these games with your own two eyes? Yes or no?


Yes I have watched games. I have been to games, thank you.

I get dismissive because when one uses the common sense tact, it's shows that any conclusion I come to, would be stupid, if it differs from yours.

I have evaluated it, and I see it differently.

What does that mean to you?

I have concerns that he's going to falter, like he did in Nashville, and those concerns are being shown in the results.

Conklin, seems to be largely unaffected by this 'shoddy play' of the Blues.


The problem is you seem to be basing your opinion on stats alone...and stats rarely tell the whole story, especially with goaltending.
With goalies, their stats can be heavily influenced by the play of the team around them.

Therefore, actually analyzing his play instead of just looking at the stats, would give you a better idea of how well Mason has played. Hence the "common sense" comment.

I'm not sure how actually analyzing Mason's play, instead of focusing solely on stats, can be criticized. It's the best way to evaluate any player.

So, you say you have watched the games...if so, then would you say he is a victim of the way the team is playing around him, or is he actually playing as bad as his stats are saying right now?



Again, I am NOT basing it on the stats alone...

I'm saying the proof is in the results.

I think Mason's giving up softies.
User avatar
Battra
2nd Line Scorer
2nd Line Scorer
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:34 pm
Location: St. Louis City

PreviousNext

Return to St. Louis Blues Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dmiles2186, Exabot [Bot], flyingnote38, Google [Bot], Krigloch the Furious, Misc. Blues, ORBluesFan, PGABluesFan, sseagle, STLADOGG and 12 guests