Let's Go Blues

The Thirds are two dark. They look black. The team is called the Blues, not the Blacks.

kodos wrote:The Thirds are two dark. They look black. The team is called the Blues, not the Blacks.

If we were the Blacks, would A. Nigro be on our team?

DaDitka wrote:

stlbluz wrote:I really like the 3rd, though I wouldn't completely replace the regular home jersey with it.

Gotta agree. I love the crest on the third jersey and the tie neck, but it should remain the alternate - the Blue Note isn't going anywhere.

For some odd reason I've always like the 'tie neck' style, kinda old school. As soon as I saw that our 3rd had it I had to get one.

I've said before that the Navy Blue looks black on TV, but great in person, and having "no Royal Blue" was a mistake.

IFFFF, we modify the current jersies by putting a smaller version of the "Arch crest" on the shoulders, and incorporate the "tie neck"...I think it would be great.

NOOOO, I hate everything about the third jerseys and if we incorporate anything from them into our regular jersey's I would be pissed. It is ok for a third jersey but it should stay that. And as far as the arch logo on the shoulders and an alternate logo, I wouldn't mind that but I think it needs to be something other than the one on the third.

I like the trumpets on the "stlanted jersey" but I thought they messed up the Blue version of that jersey by putting RED on the bottom instead of Yellow and leaving the red as an accent color only.

#1ELPBluzFan wrote:I like the trumpets on the "stlanted jersey" but I thought they messed up the Blue version of that jersey by putting RED on the bottom instead of Yellow and leaving the red as an accent color only.

I also liked the trumpet alot, I don't think it will go as well with these jerseys as the clown jerserys, that I love.

So, do you think the "clown jerseys" would have looked better with yellow on the bottom instead of the red?

#1ELPBluzFan wrote:So, do you think the "clown jerseys" would have looked better with yellow on the bottom instead of the red?

I don't know, I am in the minority of people who thing the red was awesome on the jersey. I would have to see it with yellow, but it doesn't sound like that would be too bad either.

section319 wrote:NOOOO, I hate everything about the third jerseys and if we incorporate anything from them into our regular jersey's I would be pissed. It is ok for a third jersey but it should stay that. And as far as the arch logo on the shoulders and an alternate logo, I wouldn't mind that but I think it needs to be something other than the one on the third.

Is this really even that big of an issue? Lets worry about our injuries and record, not the fashion aspect.

Kohl wrote:

section319 wrote:NOOOO, I hate everything about the third jerseys and if we incorporate anything from them into our regular jersey's I would be pissed. It is ok for a third jersey but it should stay that. And as far as the arch logo on the shoulders and an alternate logo, I wouldn't mind that but I think it needs to be something other than the one on the third.

Is this really even that big of an issue? Lets worry about our injuries and record, not the fashion aspect.

Is there a reason you quoted my post and not the other 30 that have to do with our jerseys?

You do realize this thread is about the blues jerseys, right? Not injuries or our record, but since you asked, yes it is that big of a deal if we turn our third jerseys into our primary jerseys.

section319 wrote:

Kohl wrote:

section319 wrote:NOOOO, I hate everything about the third jerseys and if we incorporate anything from them into our regular jersey's I would be pissed. It is ok for a third jersey but it should stay that. And as far as the arch logo on the shoulders and an alternate logo, I wouldn't mind that but I think it needs to be something other than the one on the third.

Is this really even that big of an issue? Lets worry about our injuries and record, not the fashion aspect.

Is there a reason you quoted my post and not the other 30 that have to do with our jerseys?

You do realize this thread is about the blues jerseys, right? Not injuries or our record, but since you asked, yes it is that big of a deal if we turn our third jerseys into our primary jerseys.

Because you said that red on a Blues jersey is ok. You deserved to be called out.

stlbluz wrote:

section319 wrote:

Kohl wrote:

section319 wrote:NOOOO, I hate everything about the third jerseys and if we incorporate anything from them into our regular jersey's I would be pissed. It is ok for a third jersey but it should stay that. And as far as the arch logo on the shoulders and an alternate logo, I wouldn't mind that but I think it needs to be something other than the one on the third.

Is this really even that big of an issue? Lets worry about our injuries and record, not the fashion aspect.

Is there a reason you quoted my post and not the other 30 that have to do with our jerseys?

You do realize this thread is about the blues jerseys, right? Not injuries or our record, but since you asked, yes it is that big of a deal if we turn our third jerseys into our primary jerseys.

Because you said that red on a Blues jersey is ok. You deserved to be called out.

Just like there being no "royal blue" on the third jerseys, should not be all dark blue.