Re: Blues Uni question
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:39 am
The Thirds are two dark. They look black. The team is called the Blues, not the Blacks.
Discuss the St. Louis Blues, the NHL, or whatever.
http://www.letsgoblues.com/phpBB/
If we were the Blacks, would A. Nigro be on our team?kodos wrote:The Thirds are two dark. They look black. The team is called the Blues, not the Blacks.
For some odd reason I've always like the 'tie neck' style, kinda old school. As soon as I saw that our 3rd had it I had to get one.DaDitka wrote:Gotta agree. I love the crest on the third jersey and the tie neck, but it should remain the alternate - the Blue Note isn't going anywhere.stlbluz wrote:I really like the 3rd, though I wouldn't completely replace the regular home jersey with it.
#1ELPBluzFan wrote:I like the trumpets on the "stlanted jersey" but I thought they messed up the Blue version of that jersey by putting RED on the bottom instead of Yellow and leaving the red as an accent color only.
#1ELPBluzFan wrote:So, do you think the "clown jerseys" would have looked better with yellow on the bottom instead of the red?
section319 wrote:NOOOO, I hate everything about the third jerseys and if we incorporate anything from them into our regular jersey's I would be pissed. It is ok for a third jersey but it should stay that. And as far as the arch logo on the shoulders and an alternate logo, I wouldn't mind that but I think it needs to be something other than the one on the third.
Is there a reason you quoted my post and not the other 30 that have to do with our jerseys?Kohl wrote:section319 wrote:NOOOO, I hate everything about the third jerseys and if we incorporate anything from them into our regular jersey's I would be pissed. It is ok for a third jersey but it should stay that. And as far as the arch logo on the shoulders and an alternate logo, I wouldn't mind that but I think it needs to be something other than the one on the third.
Is this really even that big of an issue? Lets worry about our injuries and record, not the fashion aspect.
Because you said that red on a Blues jersey is ok. You deserved to be called out.section319 wrote:Is there a reason you quoted my post and not the other 30 that have to do with our jerseys?Kohl wrote:section319 wrote:NOOOO, I hate everything about the third jerseys and if we incorporate anything from them into our regular jersey's I would be pissed. It is ok for a third jersey but it should stay that. And as far as the arch logo on the shoulders and an alternate logo, I wouldn't mind that but I think it needs to be something other than the one on the third.
Is this really even that big of an issue? Lets worry about our injuries and record, not the fashion aspect.
You do realize this thread is about the blues jerseys, right? Not injuries or our record, but since you asked, yes it is that big of a deal if we turn our third jerseys into our primary jerseys.
stlbluz wrote:Because you said that red on a Blues jersey is ok. You deserved to be called out.section319 wrote:Is there a reason you quoted my post and not the other 30 that have to do with our jerseys?Kohl wrote:section319 wrote:NOOOO, I hate everything about the third jerseys and if we incorporate anything from them into our regular jersey's I would be pissed. It is ok for a third jersey but it should stay that. And as far as the arch logo on the shoulders and an alternate logo, I wouldn't mind that but I think it needs to be something other than the one on the third.
Is this really even that big of an issue? Lets worry about our injuries and record, not the fashion aspect.
You do realize this thread is about the blues jerseys, right? Not injuries or our record, but since you asked, yes it is that big of a deal if we turn our third jerseys into our primary jerseys.