Underperforming Blues

Discuss the St. Louis Blues, the NHL, or anything hockey.

Moderator: LGB Mods

Underperforming Blues

Postby TheoSqua » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:04 pm

I was reading Bernies article about how its the players failing that has caused this team to play mediocre thus far. But I was looking at all the players he named and it just seems that when your entire team is under performing then it there has to be more than just individual performances.

I decided to break down each player's average points per game this season and compare it to their career PPG:

(this season) (career)
0.71 0.53 Erik Johnson
0.62 0.54 David Perron
0.65 0.90 Keith Tkachuk
0.68 0.69 Andy McDonald
0.57 0.75 Brad Boyes
0.38 1.02 Paul Kariya

0.38 0.35 Jay McClement
0.62 0.37 Carlo Colaiacovo

0.47 0.63 T.J. Oshie
0.25 0.54 Patrik Berglund
0.19 0.22 B.J. Crombeen

0.40 0.24 Barret Jackman
0.19 0.50 David Backes
0.19 0.17 Roman Polak
0.27 0.28 Eric Brewer
0.19 0.39 Darryl Sydor

0.29 0.28 Alexander Steen
0.33 0.30 Tyson Strachan
0.13 0.18 Brad Winchester


So 11 guys under performing and 8 guys over performing (these numbers are off, as it's an average of the averages and not a cumulative average):
0.33 0.52 - average for guys in red
0.49 0.40 - average for guys in blue

But our guys underperforming are doing much worse than the plus guys are in evening the team out.

I just don't see how the entire team's underperforming can be attributed to individual play. So is it coaching? (i've never been a believer that a coach can influence a team to this extent), poor scheme/strategy, a huge regression to the mean? I honestly have no idea how this many players can be playing this bad offensively.
Official LGB Sponser of 4 year old signatures:
Image
User avatar
TheoSqua
3rd Line Grinder
3rd Line Grinder
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:43 am

Re: Underperforming Blues

Postby cprice12 » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:14 pm

Regardless of what the actual reason is for the team's struggles, you have to replace the coach because you can't replace half of the roster.
And the sooner you replace him, the better.
I think everyone agrees that this team should be much better than their record...so the coach has to go. That's just the way it works.
Image
Image
User avatar
cprice12
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 19466
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Center Ice

Re: Underperforming Blues

Postby section319 » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:17 pm

Fixing the power play would fix a lot of things.
Official LGB sponsor of Vladimir Tarasenko.
User avatar
section319
Hall Of Fame
Hall Of Fame
 
Posts: 2634
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:20 am
Location: Mizzou

Re: Underperforming Blues

Postby ksbluesfan » Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:51 pm

TheoSqua wrote:I was reading Bernies article about how its the players failing that has caused this team to play mediocre thus far. But I was looking at all the players he named and it just seems that when your entire team is under performing then it there has to be more than just individual performances.

I decided to break down each player's average points per game this season and compare it to their career PPG:

(this season) (career)
0.71 0.53 Erik Johnson
0.62 0.54 David Perron
0.65 0.90 Keith Tkachuk
0.68 0.69 Andy McDonald
0.57 0.75 Brad Boyes
0.38 1.02 Paul Kariya

0.38 0.35 Jay McClement
0.62 0.37 Carlo Colaiacovo

0.47 0.63 T.J. Oshie
0.25 0.54 Patrik Berglund
0.19 0.22 B.J. Crombeen

0.40 0.24 Barret Jackman
0.19 0.50 David Backes
0.19 0.17 Roman Polak
0.27 0.28 Eric Brewer
0.19 0.39 Darryl Sydor

0.29 0.28 Alexander Steen
0.33 0.30 Tyson Strachan
0.13 0.18 Brad Winchester


So 11 guys under performing and 8 guys over performing (these numbers are off, as it's an average of the averages and not a cumulative average):
0.33 0.52 - average for guys in red
0.49 0.40 - average for guys in blue

But our guys underperforming are doing much worse than the plus guys are in evening the team out.

I just don't see how the entire team's underperforming can be attributed to individual play. So is it coaching? (i've never been a believer that a coach can influence a team to this extent), poor scheme/strategy, a huge regression to the mean? I honestly have no idea how this many players can be playing this bad offensively.


Shouldn't there be a +/- 5% margin? If so, several players are where they should be. Someone like Tkachuk can't be expected to get a point per game at this point in his career. It's guys like Boyes, Kariya, Berglund, and Backes that are a problem. Do you blame the coach for problems with a streaky goal scorer (Boyes), a player coming back after missing a season (Kariya), a sophomore (Berglund), and a guy coming off what might have been a career year (Backes)? When these guys aren't scoring goals, there are less assists to go around too.

Also, Polak and Strachan should be blue, not red.
User avatar
ksbluesfan
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 10:03 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

Re: Underperforming Blues

Postby kodos » Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:14 pm

Boyes looks better in the list then he should too, because he has a bunch of assists... but he's not paid to get assists, he's paid to get goals.

The bottom line is that either 90% of our scoring forwards are all slumping, at the exact same time... or something is very wrong with our offensive system.
Last edited by kodos on Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
kodos
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 11893
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:05 pm

Re: Underperforming Blues

Postby WaukeeBlues » Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:14 pm

And it's kinda unfair to be basing performance strictly on points.

EJ is playing out of his mind right now, and while our defense was anemic in the scoring department last season I would take every single defensemen being held scoreless as long as we kept every team to 1 or 2 goals a game all season if that's what it took.

It's all a complex combo of things but enough players are sucking it for it to be something beyond just "having a bad year," like you said.
Image
User avatar
WaukeeBlues
Hall Of Fame
Hall Of Fame
 
Posts: 4660
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 3:00 pm
Location: Phi Alpha

Re: Underperforming Blues

Postby TheoSqua » Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:43 pm

Yeah i didn't really make this to be perfectly accurate. And I considered making a gray area for the players who are playing up to their standard ppg (McDonald, Steen, Polak, etc.)

But really, you expect some decline. Tkachuck is no longer a PPG player, and apparently neither is Kariya. But their decline should be balanced with an increase in production from our younger guys. But outside of Perron, none of them have really stepped up.

My point was that the offensive issues isn't just caused by a hand ful of players who are on the Power Play suddenly not being productive, it's essentially the entire team has gone cold simultaneously. I think it's really rare that this would be purely due to luck.
Official LGB Sponser of 4 year old signatures:
Image
User avatar
TheoSqua
3rd Line Grinder
3rd Line Grinder
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:43 am

Re: Underperforming Blues

Postby Krigloch the Furious » Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:23 pm

As far as im concerned, Perron has not stepped up. With a different coach he would have 14-15 goals by now.
Murray is the problem. The system sucks. Im tired of saying this crap in every thread.
User avatar
Krigloch the Furious
All-Star
All-Star
 
Posts: 1487
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 12:58 pm
Location: Springfield, IL

Re: Underperforming Blues

Postby gaijin » Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:51 pm

Krigloch the Furious wrote:As far as im concerned, Perron has not stepped up. With a different coach he would have 14-15 goals by now.
Murray is the problem. The system sucks. Im tired of saying this crap in every thread.


The know what the answer is then, don't you?

j/k- couldn't pass up the opportunity. :lol:
Image
User avatar
gaijin
Hall Of Fame
Hall Of Fame
 
Posts: 2747
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 7:46 pm
Location: An undisclosed location in SW Asia

Re: Underperforming Blues

Postby goon attack » Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:59 pm

it's simple: either Murray sends them out there with explicit orders to goon in the hell up or he should be fired.

CASE FRANKING CLOSED.

not only are they losing, but they're BORING. that's worse because come on.. we all know they won't win the damn cup, um, ever.

:facepalm:
Official '13-'14 sponsor of another season of bitter disappointment
Past Sponsorships: '13: communism; 11-'12: Vlad Sobotka and fake, drunken lesbianism; 10-'11: Ryan Reaves, Bo Derek's cans, Willow Palin, and the new Lightning logo; 09-'10: the epic destruction of the Politics Forum; 08-'09: Sandy Miller
User avatar
goon attack
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 17054
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:18 pm


Return to St. Louis Blues Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: abc789987, Google [Bot] and 5 guests