Playing not to loose

Discuss the St. Louis Blues, the NHL, or anything hockey.

Moderator: LGB Mods

Playing not to loose

Postby DaDitka » Sun Nov 29, 2009 6:30 pm

We all know that prevent defense prevent victories and playing not to loose ends in losses more then victories.


So why did Carlo and EJ have teh fewest minutes in OT of all the D-men last night?


Murray should know we suck at shoot outs, just got luck and won on, and it's the freakign Red-Wins. Why the hell weren't we playing for the win? I simply don't get it.
Image

2012-2013 Official LGB Sponsor of Patrik 'Bulan' Berglund
User avatar
DaDitka
Hall Of Fame
Hall Of Fame
 
Posts: 2800
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:21 pm
Location: sailing with the Captain

Re: Playing not to loose

Postby cprice12 » Mon Nov 30, 2009 12:11 am

In the post game press conference, Murray said, "we had the right guys on the ice when the game tying goal was scored."

Really?

Jackman and Pollack were "the right guys"? Pollack maybe...but I'd have liked to have seen EJ out there. Jackman is mainly only good for NOT getting the puck out of the zone at crucial times.

Personally, I don't want Jackman on the ice when the game is on the line. Put your most skilled guys on the ice and may the better line prevail.

Norm Sanders Tweeted to me that the players on the ice need to get the puck out of the zone in that situation. Well, I say the coach needs to put the team in the best position to win the game by putting the right players on the ice. I think Murray failed to do that at the end of Saturday night's game.

Detroit had their best players on the ice to end the game...Datsyuk, Zetterberg, Lidstrom... pretty simple really. Jackman is NOT one of our top 2 defenseman...so why was he out there??
Image
Image

2014-2015 Sponsor -- Blues Asst. Coach Kirk Muller
User avatar
cprice12
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 19685
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Center Ice

Re: Playing not to loose

Postby SteveO » Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:07 am

cprice12 wrote:Detroit had their best players on the ice to end the game...Datsyuk, Zetterberg, Lidstrom... pretty simple really. Jackman is NOT one of our top 2 defenseman...so why was he out there??


Jackman played against that line the whole game.
User avatar
SteveO
LGB Booster - Blue
LGB Booster - Blue
 
Posts: 5488
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:08 am
Location: Section 306

Re: Playing not to loose

Postby cprice12 » Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:34 pm

Prngr44 wrote:
cprice12 wrote:Detroit had their best players on the ice to end the game...Datsyuk, Zetterberg, Lidstrom... pretty simple really. Jackman is NOT one of our top 2 defenseman...so why was he out there??


Jackman played against that line the whole game.


He didn't play against THAT line. Zetterberg and Datsyuk weren't on the same line most of the game.
Detroit switched it up and put their best players out there...Blues should have done the same since we had last change.
Image
Image

2014-2015 Sponsor -- Blues Asst. Coach Kirk Muller
User avatar
cprice12
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 19685
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Center Ice

Re: Playing not to loose

Postby ohio BLUES » Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:45 pm

Apropo of nothing, time's running out on getting Peter Laviolette if Darren Dreger (TSN) is to be believed:

DarrenDreger Flyers coach John Stevens is running out of time. He needs his team to win. If Stevens gets gonged, Laviolette is a contender for the job.
Image

Official LGB.com Sponsor of Gymrat Ken Hitchcock
User avatar
ohio BLUES
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 10346
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 3:42 pm


Return to St. Louis Blues Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], dmiles2186, JesusNEVERexisted, ORBluesFan, STLADOGG, Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests