Moderator: LGB Mods
sseagle wrote:I would have liked if the Cansucks would have at least battered the Kings, but I understand they were shell shocked after three quick losses and basically rolled over.
Who do we have that can take out Quick?
That said, we are the better team, I think we should be able to take it.
Blues in 6
dhabums wrote:You and your buddies here are a joke and most of this site knows it.
WaukeeBlues wrote:This is gonna be a tough one. Hope you all are ready for 1-0, 2-1 games all series long haha.
This series will turn on our ability to beat Quick. He stands on his head I think we lose this series but we find a way for the offense to connect, we'll take it. Either way it won't be a 4 or 5 game series.
Blues in 7
It would be a pretty big story for the #8 seed to beat the #1 & #2 seeds in back to back rounds.
dmiles2186 wrote:This will be tough, but any possible series matchup we would have had would have been. From here on out there are no gimmes, and that's what makes the NHL playoffs great.
gaijin wrote:The Blues have faced the Kings in the postseason twice, most recently in 1998. Remember Jamie Storr? I know Curt does.
In that series as well as 1969, the Blues won in 4 games. Ergo, we have never lost a playoff game to LA.
thedoc wrote:DaDitka and I were talking about JR's tweet. It should start Friday because of Van Halen at Scott on Saturday. I have an extra ticket. So I think I am going to sell it for $ One Billion Dollars.
That that Cardsfan
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], STLADOGG and 4 guests