Page 1 of 2

Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 9:02 pm
by sseagle
Oh, how exciting, two teams I hate...

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 5:31 am
by gaijin
sseagle wrote:Oh, how exciting, two teams I hate...
And Chicago/Detroit wasn't?

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 9:11 am
by STLADOGG
Isn't it sad when you want a team that beat you 2 straight years to win it all? :facepalm: (to myself)

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 9:15 am
by sseagle
gaijin wrote:
sseagle wrote:Oh, how exciting, two teams I hate...
And Chicago/Detroit wasn't?
To be honest, I'm pretty sure I hate all 30 teams.

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:48 pm
by glen a richter
Go no one!

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 6:32 pm
by flyingnote38
In my opinion, the last four remaining teams this year are the league's actual 4 best.

The Hawks Kings series should be of particular interest for Blues fans, as the Kings are basically a better version of the Blues.

Here's hoping the Kings win the Cup; losing to the first repeat Cup champs in 15 years would ease the sting a bit.

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 2:26 pm
by dmiles2186
Q, Lips, and Payne are all involved in this series. So if it's not former players, it's former coaches going deep in the playoffs.

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 2:33 pm
by sseagle
dmiles2186 wrote:Q, Lips, and Payne are all involved in this series. So if it's not former players, it's former coaches going deep in the playoffs.
That's what she said?

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 7:49 pm
by philco_3
Go Bruins? FML

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 9:27 pm
by sseagle
Chicago puts LA in a 0-2 hole... Will LA pull some horseshit outta their ass?

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 9:26 am
by WaukeeBlues
sseagle wrote:Chicago puts LA in a 0-2 hole... Will LA pull some horseshit outta their ass?
I don't see it happening. Quick showed last night that he's not in "invincible brick wall" mode (or at least not as continuously as last year) and Chicago is just too talented up front. Kings losing Richards hurt big time, Brown and Kopitar aren't scoring... the Kings have arrived at the place where now it's the big boys playing and they can't hang. I think they'll win one game out in LA then drop the series when it goes back to Chicago. 4:1 Hawks series win.

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2013 11:01 am
by sseagle
WaukeeBlues wrote:
sseagle wrote:Chicago puts LA in a 0-2 hole... Will LA pull some horseshit outta their ass?
I don't see it happening. Quick showed last night that he's not in "invincible brick wall" mode (or at least not as continuously as last year) and Chicago is just too talented up front. Kings losing Richards hurt big time, Brown and Kopitar aren't scoring... the Kings have arrived at the place where now it's the big boys playing and they can't hang. I think they'll win one game out in LA then drop the series when it goes back to Chicago. 4:1 Hawks series win.
So the hawks win their second cup since the blues have existed...

Lets he honest, the east ain't winning shit, right?

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:00 am
by flyingnote38
“With the sustained pressure they’ve had on us and the way they’re able to generate turnovers and then capitalize on them is maybe more effective than St. Louis,” Kings defenseman Rob Scuderi said. “They have some different players that are maybe more offensively dynamic.”

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:25 pm
by Oaklandblue
Hitchcock doesn't coach offense. He coaches offense through defense. To say we don't have the right players, I have to disagree to a point. The issue is the system and our system contributes to stunting production of goals.

The Hawks aren't out of the woods yet. We overpowered the Kings too in Game 1 and 2 only to have the Kings shift into high gear and hang in the fight.

As for the East not winning anything, watch out for the Killer B's, cause they're proving to be the one team that's able to dig deeper than the skillset they possess and find ways to win.

IF Crosby would be willing to hit and play agressively, the Pens would follow that, but he's just....not that kind of guy. The Pens seem to live and die by the attitude of their Captain, or am I seeing things?

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:38 pm
by sseagle
Queens lost at home... 3 - 1 shitcago

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2013 6:26 pm
by sseagle
Jonathan Sieve strikes again!

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2013 6:30 pm
by sseagle
A second quick quicking!

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2013 8:37 pm
by sseagle
sounds like the nbc crew wants more games... i dont know how anyone would be blowing the kings so much, when they have basically played like crap

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2013 8:45 pm
by sseagle
What's this ? More last minute LA horseshit!

Re: Campbell Conference Final : Los Angeles v Chicago

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:47 pm
by sseagle
Second OOOOOOVERTIME?