theohall wrote:Anyway on the firing people thing...
I appreciate the well-expressed perspective. Yes, I agree that part of what we're experiencing is the sort of angst you'd expect while watching a team go through a transition and the growing pains that come with that. I've had my dad and brother lamenting D getting caught up the play over the last few games and I've had to point out that that's one of the things we wanted to see more of after the last few seasons. So yeah, that's a valid point. But still...
It's halfway through the season and in terms of tactics, this teams seems to be all over the place. Frequently-to my eyes-any semblance of playing a system disappears in recent games.
Then
theohall wrote:1) Just get the team to the playoffs.
If Minnesota & Nashville win their games in hand (I know, but still), the Blues would be in the second wild card spot by one point. At least we'd be lined up for a matchup with the Stars, who often bring the best out of this squad this season...
And then
theohall wrote:If someone, somewhere is struggling, use the regular season - even if it means losing games as long as the playoffs are in sight - to right whatever area they might be struggling with.
But what we've mainly seen is Hitchcock continuing with his stubborn insistence on using the players he "trusts" in situations where they're not productive. See: inserting Berglund immediately into the second line, continuing to give Petro & Bouwmeester 5 more minutes on the ice than any other D and using the likes of Backes and Paajarvi in 3v3 OT instead of Fabbri & Parayko.
theohall wrote:Many say one player doesn't matter. Well, when that one player is replaced by someone who isn't as effective defensively, doesn't have the same hockey sense, doesn't finish as well, if at all, or doesn't skate as well, it impacts the team's overall presence.
Sure, fair enough. A couple of things mitigate that for me though. First is Hitchcock's misuse of players that I've already mentioned. Second is that, without Schwartz this squad still features three players that have scored 30 goals before and two others who have scored 20 on 9 occasions and none of these guys are past their prime. The Canadians losing Gallagher on top of Price has a much more pronounced effect as he is one of only 4 players on that team who have ever been 20 goal guys who aren't totally washed up (Alexander Semin).
theohall wrote:Then Berglund-Backes-Brouwer as a 3rd line and maybe we get something out of Berglund being with two guys who will do the hard work Berglund won't do consistently.
This is the sort of mentality the team's leadership clearly has and which I'd really like to see shed. Berglund is not a prospect. He's not productive enough for the top lines on this team and I certainly don't see the point of parking his soft ass on the 3rd line so he can float while 2/3 of the line do the work. They don't have something on the farm better than that? They know that for sure? Why not try something different? It's not like the current approach has yielded unqualified success AND it the team seems headed in the wrong direction right now.
theohall wrote:I can wait and see, because it's the playoffs that matter, not the regular season.
The current angst has its roots in the fact that the Blues making the playoffs looks far from guaranteed right now. That's as much down to a stupid playoff qualification format as anything but it's a real possibility.