IF, we do make a big move and it costs us a lot...we better damn well finish ahead of Chicago. Then the move will have been worth it.
Moderator: LGB Mods


BoxCar wrote:3 runs is enough to win games, but not all of them and none with this pen.

theohall wrote:BoxCar wrote:3 runs is enough to win games, but not all of them and none with this pen.
Teams which only scored 3 runs yesterday went 5-18. 3 runs is not enough to win in baseball today.
St Louis is 6-36 when they've scored 3 runs or less this season (8 losses alone to the Brewers whom the Cards have struggled against offensively more than anyone else in the NL. Only the Royals have had more success holding down the Cards O). This bears out across baseball today. Teams which score 3 runs or less have around a .170 win% no matter how good or bad their bullpen.
You've got to have offense - this is especially true with a weak bullpen - and 3 runs is weak offense in today's game.

cprice12 wrote:theohall wrote:BoxCar wrote:3 runs is enough to win games, but not all of them and none with this pen.
Teams which only scored 3 runs yesterday went 5-18. 3 runs is not enough to win in baseball today.
St Louis is 6-36 when they've scored 3 runs or less this season (8 losses alone to the Brewers whom the Cards have struggled against offensively more than anyone else in the NL. Only the Royals have had more success holding down the Cards O). This bears out across baseball today. Teams which score 3 runs or less have around a .170 win% no matter how good or bad their bullpen.
You've got to have offense - this is especially true with a weak bullpen - and 3 runs is weak offense in today's game.
Three runs is generally not quite enough to win.
However...when two good teams are playing each other and both are making a run at the division leader, games can be and often are relatively low scoring. Good teams usually have good pitching, and good pitching usually beats good hitting....which means low scoring games. In those cases, three runs can be enough to win. And the bullpen is quite often the difference in the game...as was the case in three of the four games vs. the Brewers. And the one game where we didn't have a lead late, the Brewers only scored three runs, and won the game.

theohall wrote:cprice12 wrote:theohall wrote:BoxCar wrote:3 runs is enough to win games, but not all of them and none with this pen.
Teams which only scored 3 runs yesterday went 5-18. 3 runs is not enough to win in baseball today.
St Louis is 6-36 when they've scored 3 runs or less this season (8 losses alone to the Brewers whom the Cards have struggled against offensively more than anyone else in the NL. Only the Royals have had more success holding down the Cards O). This bears out across baseball today. Teams which score 3 runs or less have around a .170 win% no matter how good or bad their bullpen.
You've got to have offense - this is especially true with a weak bullpen - and 3 runs is weak offense in today's game.
Three runs is generally not quite enough to win.
However...when two good teams are playing each other and both are making a run at the division leader, games can be and often are relatively low scoring. Good teams usually have good pitching, and good pitching usually beats good hitting....which means low scoring games. In those cases, three runs can be enough to win. And the bullpen is quite often the difference in the game...as was the case in three of the four games vs. the Brewers. And the one game where we didn't have a lead late, the Brewers only scored three runs, and won the game.
However, everyone knows the Cardinals have a weak bullpen and thus won't win if they don't score more than 3 runs in most cases. This isn't an either/or situation. It's both weak offense and a crappy bullpen combined.



OS wrote:Onley said on 1380 this morning that the Rockies aren't going to move Fuentes now and apparently the Orioles want a major league ready young shortstop in a trade for Sherril (which the Cards dont have).



richtedm wrote:I know it happens every year, but Manny Ramirez is once again talking about how he wants out of Boston. He is in the last year of an 8 year deal with two consecutive options at $20 million. He is 36. Assuming (which I don't actually believe) that he gets traded this year... anybody want him in St. Louis?




dmiles2186 wrote:Ron Mahay, people. That's who we need to get instead of Fuentes.
Mahay: 54.7 IP, 42 K, 21 BB, 11 ER, 1.81 ERA
Fuentes: 40.0 IP, 43 K, 11 BB, 14 ER, 3.15 ERA
Mahay would be cheaper and he doesn't let runs score. I say do it, if at all possible.


Return to St. Louis Cardinals Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests