Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:16 pm
by goon attack
WaukeeBlues wrote:goon attack wrote:WaukeeBlues wrote: Why the hell is it illegal for me to enjoy my own music that I legally purchased in a way I see fit?
It's not. Have a cock and relax.
I wasn't being absolutely politically correct- forgive me oh anal one.
Here's the smart-ass-proof version.
"I do not see the logic in a judge ruling in favor of the RIAA that would push to make it illegal for individuals to purchase music legally on a compact disc or other method of music storage and then restrict the use thereof of said music; in this instance, the transfer of this music to a computer hard drive or media player on said device."
You understand me now?
What I do understand is that a judge has not ruled that way.
Or did I miss that somewhere?
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:58 pm
by WaukeeBlues
goon attack wrote:WaukeeBlues wrote:goon attack wrote:WaukeeBlues wrote: Why the hell is it illegal for me to enjoy my own music that I legally purchased in a way I see fit?
It's not. Have a cock and relax.
I wasn't being absolutely politically correct- forgive me oh anal one.
Here's the smart-ass-proof version.
"I do not see the logic in a judge ruling in favor of the RIAA that would push to make it illegal for individuals to purchase music legally on a compact disc or other method of music storage and then restrict the use thereof of said music; in this instance, the transfer of this music to a computer hard drive or media player on said device."
You understand me now?
What I do understand is that a judge has not ruled that way.
Or did I miss that somewhere?
You are correct.
I was simply expressing my disbelief that any such argument (a ridiculous one in my point of view) was brought to court in the first place.
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:37 pm
by goon attack
WaukeeBlues wrote:
You are correct.
I was simply expressing my disbelief that any such argument (a ridiculous one in my point of view) was brought to court in the first place.
"disbelief"
"ridiculous"
"court"
Hmmm....not much experience with lawyers I presume?
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:00 pm
by WaukeeBlues
goon attack wrote:WaukeeBlues wrote:
You are correct.
I was simply expressing my disbelief that any such argument (a ridiculous one in my point of view) was brought to court in the first place.
"disbelief"
"ridiculous"
"court"
Hmmm....not much experience with lawyers I presume?
good point.