.284 avg
393HR
1199 RBI
8 Gold Glove
My dad and I, who usually agree on sports, argued about this at bw3s tonight watching the cards game. I say he's a HOF'r cuz he was arguably best CF in baseball for a decade w/ decent offensive stats and no steroid allegations. Thoughts?
Jim Edmonds: HOF'r or not?
Moderator: LGB Mods
-
- Hall Of Fame
- Posts: 4027
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:43 am
Jim Edmonds: HOF'r or not?
2010-2011 Official LGB Sponsor of Kevin Shattenkirk
2016-2017 Official LGB Sponsor of Dmitri Jaskin
2017-2018 Official LGB Sponsor of Jake Allen
2016-2017 Official LGB Sponsor of Dmitri Jaskin
2017-2018 Official LGB Sponsor of Jake Allen
- DaDitka
- Hall Of Fame
- Posts: 2800
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:21 pm
- Location: sailing with the Captain
Re: Jim Edmonds: HOF'r or not?
Considering the MLB HOF is the 'hall of really good' - Maybe.
If MLB had the high standards the NFL has ...... not a chance.
If MLB had the high standards the NFL has ...... not a chance.
2012-2013 Official LGB Sponsor of Patrik 'Bulan' Berglund
- dmiles2186
- Hockey God
- Posts: 7288
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Selling Air Bombays--for kids who want to coach
Re: Jim Edmonds: HOF'r or not?
I really think it depends on (sadly enough) other outfielders and their history with steroids. Take for instance the recently retired Manny Ramirez. He's a HOF lock...until you factor in the PED use. Now, Edmonds retired in Jan/Feb of '11 and Manny just retired. Say they come up in the same HOF voting group. If Edmonds comes off as the clean one, maybe his numbers look a little different. Also factor in that if there are other players who used that come up for voting, they prob won't factor in much either (Palmiero, Sosa, Clemens, Bonds). You won't have as many spots taken, and Edmonds may be near the top of the 'clean' bunch. Again, this is assuming he never used and nothing comes out.
But overall? I don't think he is. He was great defensively, but not quite the game changer Ozzie Smith was (someone who got in solely on defense). At the same time, he was much better offensively, but not at a Hall of Fame level. Tough call, but I still say no.
But overall? I don't think he is. He was great defensively, but not quite the game changer Ozzie Smith was (someone who got in solely on defense). At the same time, he was much better offensively, but not at a Hall of Fame level. Tough call, but I still say no.
2015-2016 LGB Sponsor of Not Ott, because he is a booger-eating dumb dumb
Re: Jim Edmonds: HOF'r or not?
I can only think that so many that are thought to have used PED's that won't get votes might help his chances. But I just don't think he will make the cut.
Official Sponsor of "The Barn"
2013-2014 Official Sponsor of David "Captain America" Backes
2012-2013 Official Sponsor of David "Captain America" Backes
2011-2012 Official Sponsor of David "Captain America" Backes
2010-2011 Official Sponsor of Brad Winchester
2009-2010 Official Sponsor of Paul Kariya
- DaDitka
- Hall Of Fame
- Posts: 2800
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:21 pm
- Location: sailing with the Captain
Re: Jim Edmonds: HOF'r or not?
Now, if there were a hall of fame for wearing half shirts........
2012-2013 Official LGB Sponsor of Patrik 'Bulan' Berglund
- goon attack
- Hockey God
- Posts: 17345
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:18 pm
Re: Jim Edmonds: HOF'r or not?
No freakin' way. He doesn't deserve to be in.
If his stats looked like this:
AVG .290
HR 400
RBI 1400
8 GG
then yes... his numbers are damn good, just a little short if you ask me. He failed to reach 2000 hits... had he just done that, plus gotten to 400 jacks, he'd have a better chance. jim Rice barely got in with better numbers... way better considering the era he played in. Then again, that dillhole Ozzie Smith got in so... ya never know.
Plus he drove that douchey HUMMER around town all the time like a jackoff
If his stats looked like this:
AVG .290
HR 400
RBI 1400
8 GG
then yes... his numbers are damn good, just a little short if you ask me. He failed to reach 2000 hits... had he just done that, plus gotten to 400 jacks, he'd have a better chance. jim Rice barely got in with better numbers... way better considering the era he played in. Then again, that dillhole Ozzie Smith got in so... ya never know.
Plus he drove that douchey HUMMER around town all the time like a jackoff
Official 2023-'24 Sponsor of: Dua Lipa, Craig Berube, and yoga pants
'22-'23: Kim Wexler; '21-'22: Slayyyter; '21: fat chicks and covid-19; '19-'20: Taco Bell's Spicy Tostada (discontinued); '18-'19: Bhad Bhabie; '17-'18 Pitbull.'16-'17: Donald J. Trump, Black Lives Matter, and Karlie Kloss; '15-'16: the Hadids; '14-'15: $17.8+ trillion U.S. national debt; '13-'14: another season of bitter disappointment; '13: communism; '11-'12: Vlad Sobotka and fake, drunken lesbianism; '10-'11: Ryan Reaves, Bo Derek's cans, Willow Palin, and the new Lightning logo; '09-'10: the epic destruction of the Politics Forum; '08-'09: Sandy Miller
'22-'23: Kim Wexler; '21-'22: Slayyyter; '21: fat chicks and covid-19; '19-'20: Taco Bell's Spicy Tostada (discontinued); '18-'19: Bhad Bhabie; '17-'18 Pitbull.'16-'17: Donald J. Trump, Black Lives Matter, and Karlie Kloss; '15-'16: the Hadids; '14-'15: $17.8+ trillion U.S. national debt; '13-'14: another season of bitter disappointment; '13: communism; '11-'12: Vlad Sobotka and fake, drunken lesbianism; '10-'11: Ryan Reaves, Bo Derek's cans, Willow Palin, and the new Lightning logo; '09-'10: the epic destruction of the Politics Forum; '08-'09: Sandy Miller
- dmiles2186
- Hockey God
- Posts: 7288
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Selling Air Bombays--for kids who want to coach
Re: Jim Edmonds: HOF'r or not?
Hall of Fame voters most definitely take this into account when filling out their ballots.goon attack wrote:Plus he drove that douchey HUMMER around town all the time like a jackoff
2015-2016 LGB Sponsor of Not Ott, because he is a booger-eating dumb dumb