Boycott: Make a Statement

Discuss the St. Louis Blues, the NHL, or anything hockey.

Moderator: LGB Mods

Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby Hallplante » Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:00 am

Boycott first period of Blues' first home game. #NHLFansUnite
User avatar
Hallplante
3rd Line Grinder
3rd Line Grinder
 
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby philco_3 » Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:01 am

:okman:
2009-2010 LGB Official Sponsor of Roman Polak
2010-2011 LGB Official Sponsor of the Brad Boyes 2011 2nd round draft pick.
2011-2012 LGB Official Sponsor of "The Russian" Evgeny Grachev
Image
2013 LGB Official Sponsor of David Perron
2013-2014 LGB Official Sponsor of Jay Bouwmeester

9-7-11 We Will Never Forget.
User avatar
philco_3
All-Star
All-Star
 
Posts: 2296
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:43 pm
Location: Red Bud, IL and Section 307 Row M

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby cprice12 » Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:08 am

That would be awesome if nobody were in the stands for the 1st period.
Image
Image
User avatar
cprice12
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 19443
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Center Ice

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby F Keenan » Sun Jan 06, 2013 12:49 pm

:roll:
Image

*I tend to only post on this site when I'm intoxicated.
User avatar
F Keenan
All-Star
All-Star
 
Posts: 2165
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 11:10 am
Location: Kirkwood, MO

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby cprice12 » Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:05 pm

F Keenan wrote::roll:

You no like?
I think it would be an amazingly hilarious statement if arenas around the NHL were empty for the entire first period of each team's first game. It would probably hit home more with the players than the owners, as the owners are still going to get their money from the tickets, but the players actually playing in front of nobody for a whole period? That would be a strong statement.

I get the impression that players take an awful lot for granted. Maybe they need a reminder of who pays their salaries and who they are pissing off. It would surely embarrass them to not be playing in front of anyone. It might make them think that if they pissed off enough fans, that maybe things would always be like this if another long lockout happens again in the near future.

The message? Don't bite the hand that feeds you or you might not get fed anymore.

There will probably be a lot of empty seats anyway...well, not the opening games, but the games after. A lot of fans aren't going to be there that would have been ordinarily. But some sort of organized effort that actually works would be awesome. Too bad it won't happen.
Image
Image
User avatar
cprice12
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 19443
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 1:26 am
Location: Center Ice

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby glen a richter » Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:20 pm

In theory it's a great idea. I'd even go a step further and say all fans should boycott the first period of every game including playoffs. But in reality, that's something that just won't happen. Not nearly enough people will pay full price for a ticket to see 2/3rds of a game. It's like when they have those gas boycotts that they send e-mails around to not buy gas on the first Wednesday of odd numbered months. A few people may do it, but not nearly enough to make an impact. The NHL won't care one bit if a few thousand fans around the league boycott one period a game because there's a few more thousand fans who won't. If you must go to the games, make a statement with strongly worded signs. If you choose not to go to the games, that's making a statement enough. On the overall, make a statement by not buying any merchandise bearing the team logo. By all means, buy food at the concession supporting the little man who got screwed by the lockout and tip the kid who serves you the food and rings you up. If you can get away with it, bring your own cup so you're not buying one with a logo on it, and tip the usher even if you know where your seats are. They're the ones who, along with us, got screwed these past few months.
Official sponsor of Ian Cole 2011-2012
Official sponsor of Gary Bettman's Pink Slip 2013
Official sponsor of Dmitrij Jaskin 2013-2014
glen a richter
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 7146
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 8:02 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby cardsfan04 » Sun Jan 06, 2013 4:26 pm

I get the anger and desire to stick it to em. But, I'm not boycotting. It's been hellish waiting for hockey to start. So, I'm not going to punish myself for their sins.

The first period thing sounds pretty cool though.
2010-2011 Official LGB Sponsor of Kevin Shattenkirk
cardsfan04
All-Star
All-Star
 
Posts: 2281
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:43 am

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby thedoc » Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:42 am

A good and noble idea, but not going to happen. But I agree that it would be a powerful message.
Image

Official Sponsor of "The Barn"
2013-2014 Official Sponsor of David "Captain America" Backes
2012-2013 Official Sponsor of David "Captain America" Backes
2011-2012 Official Sponsor of David "Captain America" Backes
2010-2011 Official Sponsor of Brad Winchester
2009-2010 Official Sponsor of Paul Kariya
User avatar
thedoc
All-Star
All-Star
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:22 pm
Location: O'Fallon or TOP SHELF

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby kodos » Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:46 am

A more powerful message would be if no one was in the stands for the whole game.
Image
User avatar
kodos
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 11893
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:05 pm

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby thedoc » Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:54 am

Well I do know this. I canceled my half season plan. 1. With the shortened season I can't go to 2 or 3 games a week and 2. I know that the price that I paid for them I can buy my same seats for .50 to .60 cents on the dollar once the season starts. So they have already lost $1500.00
Image

Official Sponsor of "The Barn"
2013-2014 Official Sponsor of David "Captain America" Backes
2012-2013 Official Sponsor of David "Captain America" Backes
2011-2012 Official Sponsor of David "Captain America" Backes
2010-2011 Official Sponsor of Brad Winchester
2009-2010 Official Sponsor of Paul Kariya
User avatar
thedoc
All-Star
All-Star
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:22 pm
Location: O'Fallon or TOP SHELF

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby theohall » Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:53 pm

I will not boycott the Blues. St Louis had 3 player actually at the negotiations trying to end the lockout. Stillman certainly did not want to buy a team and immediately have the league go into a doggone lockout. Heck, little he could do being the most junior owner in the league. Boycotting the Blues for the actions of the other idiot owners when the Blues players actually worked on trying to end this thing sooner seems silly.

Want to boycott Minnesota, Washington, Boston, and the other ass-hat owners who were trying to get out of the massive contracts they offered, go right ahead. Just realize St Louis was NOT part of the problem as to why the lockout occurred and should not be held accountable for the actions of the other morons.
(FRANK) the Kings!!!!
User avatar
theohall
Hall Of Fame
Hall Of Fame
 
Posts: 3653
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby STLADOGG » Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:08 am

theohall wrote:I will not boycott the Blues. St Louis had 3 player actually at the negotiations trying to end the lockout. Stillman certainly did not want to buy a team and immediately have the league go into a doggone lockout. Heck, little he could do being the most junior owner in the league. Boycotting the Blues for the actions of the other idiot owners when the Blues players actually worked on trying to end this thing sooner seems silly.

Want to boycott Minnesota, Washington, Boston, and the other ass-hat owners who were trying to get out of the massive contracts they offered, go right ahead. Just realize St Louis was NOT part of the problem as to why the lockout occurred and should not be held accountable for the actions of the other morons.

You certainly make some good points.
Image
Official Stalker of Paul "Speedy Gonzalez" Kariya
2013-2014 Official LGB Sponsor of Roman Polak
TW Tiger Woods TW
User avatar
STLADOGG
All-Star
All-Star
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: -Saint Freaking Louis-

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby Oaklandblue » Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:27 am

Oh yeah, with our ticket sellers, vendors, hotel staffers, restaurant employees and everyone else that benefits from a Hockey game in town, let's boycott the first game.

Bloody IDIOTS. That changes nothing and is in line with the brand of stupidity we just witnessed.

You want REAL change, FIRE BETTMAN and his entire staff.

The Blues ownership had NOTHING to do with this, it's the SAME PEOPLE who have been pulling this BS since the Second Six Expansion, trying to weigh in the league to benefit THEM.

You want to pick a team to Boycott, how about the Rangers, the Red Wings, the Blackhawks...those who voted AGAINST profit sharing among the league and other common sense things that would help the NHL, but would take money out of their pockets, money that they've gotten from a system that allowed them to hoard it, so they did.

Boycott if the result is real change. Don't boycott cause you're mad, all it does is more damage to what you're trying to save.
2013-2014 LGB Sponsor of Derek "In The Middle" Roy
2012-2013 LGB Sponsor of Chris "NO SLEEP TIL THE CUP!" Stewart - Shhhhh!!!

Image
Oaklandblue
1st Line Sniper
1st Line Sniper
 
Posts: 719
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:20 pm

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby dmiles2186 » Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:37 am

theohall wrote:I will not boycott the Blues. St Louis had 3 player actually at the negotiations trying to end the lockout. Stillman certainly did not want to buy a team and immediately have the league go into a doggone lockout. Heck, little he could do being the most junior owner in the league. Boycotting the Blues for the actions of the other idiot owners when the Blues players actually worked on trying to end this thing sooner seems silly.

Want to boycott Minnesota, Washington, Boston, and the other ass-hat owners who were trying to get out of the massive contracts they offered, go right ahead. Just realize St Louis was NOT part of the problem as to why the lockout occurred and should not be held accountable for the actions of the other morons.


This pretty much sums up how I feel too. I was pretty upset and I think we all had a right to be. But the Blues weren't part of the problem. I heard Barrett Jackman admit on a STL Radio show (ITD Morning After) that it really was a waste of time and they probably could have agreed to the same deal months ago. But that's over now and hockey is back.

I mentioned in another thread, I could about guarantee you that Stillman in no way wanted this lockout. The Blues were one of the few smart franchises not tossing around ridiculous 10 year deals. They were giving out 2 year 'prove yourself' deals, and then awarding players with 4-5 year deals after that. Smart business. As the games get closer, I get more fired up that Blues hockey is back.
Image

Official 2013-2014 Sponsor Extraordinaire of Alex "Petro" Pietrangelo
User avatar
dmiles2186
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 5800
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Selling Air Bombays--for kids who want to coach

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby Hallplante » Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:01 pm

I concur that the Blues owners were probably not among the hard liners. It's mostly speculation because none of us were privy to the owners' meetings.

Is there a reliable list of the 30 owners that indicate whether each franchise should be punished or rewarded for its position during the labor dispute?
User avatar
Hallplante
3rd Line Grinder
3rd Line Grinder
 
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby cardsfan04 » Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:26 am

Hallplante wrote:I concur that the Blues owners were probably not among the hard liners. It's mostly speculation because none of us were privy to the owners' meetings.

Is there a reliable list of the 30 owners that indicate whether each franchise should be punished or rewarded for its position during the labor dispute?


I haven't seen an actual list. But, from the things I've heard, the big market, prominent teams were the issue. The small market teams were not.
2010-2011 Official LGB Sponsor of Kevin Shattenkirk
cardsfan04
All-Star
All-Star
 
Posts: 2281
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:43 am

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby WaukeeBlues » Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:36 am

See, my anger and frustration has now been replaced by excitement so I don't know how well I'll do with all these ideas haha
Image
User avatar
WaukeeBlues
Hall Of Fame
Hall Of Fame
 
Posts: 4647
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 3:00 pm
Location: Phi Alpha

Re: Boycott: Make a Statement

Postby theohall » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:10 pm

cardsfan04 wrote:
Hallplante wrote:I concur that the Blues owners were probably not among the hard liners. It's mostly speculation because none of us were privy to the owners' meetings.

Is there a reliable list of the 30 owners that indicate whether each franchise should be punished or rewarded for its position during the labor dispute?


I haven't seen an actual list. But, from the things I've heard, the big market, prominent teams were the issue. The small market teams were not.


This is incorrect. Minnesota is a small market team and Leopold, the owner, was one of the four in all of the early negotiations not budging on the contract thing which would have allowed him to get out of the 13 year deals he made with Parise and Suter. Like I said, hypocrisy in action.
(FRANK) the Kings!!!!
User avatar
theohall
Hall Of Fame
Hall Of Fame
 
Posts: 3653
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL


Return to St. Louis Blues Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: F Keenan, Google [Bot], ORBluesFan, Yahoo [Bot] and 6 guests