Moderator: LGB Mods

glen a richter wrote:Osgood was totally the product of the team he played on. I could have backstopped the Red Wings to at least a couple of wins given the offensive and defensive firepower they had, and I'm quite literally the worst goalie in the world. True story in 8th grade we played deck hockey in gym and no one ever wanted to play goal so they always threw me in there even though I preferred defense. In a 5 week span I gave up roughly 50 goals (I believe) to a girl and the opposing goalie also notched a goal against me. And I could have won a game or two on that Detroit team. Osgood is not an elite goalie, not now not ever and he should absolutely not be mentioned in the same breath as Roy.




abc789987 wrote:After the way the team plays with him in net, I hope he is here to stay. Can I trade Elliot for Allen in my sponsorship?


sseagle wrote:abc789987 wrote:After the way the team plays with him in net, I hope he is here to stay. Can I trade Elliot for Allen in my sponsorship?
No some newb will grab him when the sponsor thread is started at 1:30 pm on a non game day


cprice12 wrote:sseagle wrote:abc789987 wrote:After the way the team plays with him in net, I hope he is here to stay. Can I trade Elliot for Allen in my sponsorship?
No some newb will grab him when the sponsor thread is started at 1:30 pm on a non game day
Next year you let me know when you will be online a week or so before the season starts and I'll be sure to create it then so it's the most convenient for you.




gaijin wrote:One thing that strikes me while watching Allen- when the puck is off to the side of net, he always has his stick down flat on the ice, and he always hugs the post like it's a security blanket. I'm not sure if Halak and Elliott aren't doing these things, or if I just don't notice them. But it seems like these basic positioning points are really paying dividends for him.
I am worried that his AHL stats aren't better, though. We all agree he's done great while he's played with the Blues, but then why is it he does an average job against the less-talented AHL forwards? This tells me his andrenaline at playing in the NHL (or desire to prove himself at the NHL level, or whatever is driving his performance) is enabling him to play above his normal level. I fear that the more he plays with the big club, the more that will wear off. If he really is this good against the NHL teams, he should be even better against the AHL teams, and he really hasn't been.

Oaklandblue wrote:gaijin wrote:One thing that strikes me while watching Allen- when the puck is off to the side of net, he always has his stick down flat on the ice, and he always hugs the post like it's a security blanket. I'm not sure if Halak and Elliott aren't doing these things, or if I just don't notice them. But it seems like these basic positioning points are really paying dividends for him.
I am worried that his AHL stats aren't better, though. We all agree he's done great while he's played with the Blues, but then why is it he does an average job against the less-talented AHL forwards? This tells me his andrenaline at playing in the NHL (or desire to prove himself at the NHL level, or whatever is driving his performance) is enabling him to play above his normal level. I fear that the more he plays with the big club, the more that will wear off. If he really is this good against the NHL teams, he should be even better against the AHL teams, and he really hasn't been.
He really hasn't been that good stats-wise here either. Wins are the best, but he's operating at below .900. Those 3 goals with the Yotes would have normally sank us but Hitch fixed a line and suddenly offense paid a visit and brought six goals with them.
This team believes in Jake and Jake has absolutely no give up in him. Look at his eyes. He plays without fear.


Allen to play vs. SJ, Halak vs. ANA. Why Allen next? Hitchism: "Last year we rewarded shutouts. Now we're rewarding wins. Bar has changed."


abc789987 wrote:Oaklandblue wrote:gaijin wrote:One thing that strikes me while watching Allen- when the puck is off to the side of net, he always has his stick down flat on the ice, and he always hugs the post like it's a security blanket. I'm not sure if Halak and Elliott aren't doing these things, or if I just don't notice them. But it seems like these basic positioning points are really paying dividends for him.
I am worried that his AHL stats aren't better, though. We all agree he's done great while he's played with the Blues, but then why is it he does an average job against the less-talented AHL forwards? This tells me his andrenaline at playing in the NHL (or desire to prove himself at the NHL level, or whatever is driving his performance) is enabling him to play above his normal level. I fear that the more he plays with the big club, the more that will wear off. If he really is this good against the NHL teams, he should be even better against the AHL teams, and he really hasn't been.
He really hasn't been that good stats-wise here either. Wins are the best, but he's operating at below .900. Those 3 goals with the Yotes would have normally sank us but Hitch fixed a line and suddenly offense paid a visit and brought six goals with them.
This team believes in Jake and Jake has absolutely no give up in him. Look at his eyes. He plays without fear.
I didn't get to watch the game last night (stupid freaking basketball in Indiana...), only got to see the highlights on NHL.com, but it looked like he made a lot of huge saves when he needed to at times. If he can do this I'll be happy.

DaDitka wrote:This tweet from JR and quote from Hitch says it all...Allen to play vs. SJ, Halak vs. ANA. Why Allen next? Hitchism: "Last year we rewarded shutouts. Now we're rewarding wins. Bar has changed."

Oaklandblue wrote:DaDitka wrote:This tweet from JR and quote from Hitch says it all...Allen to play vs. SJ, Halak vs. ANA. Why Allen next? Hitchism: "Last year we rewarded shutouts. Now we're rewarding wins. Bar has changed."
If a shutout is a win without goals scored against us and a win is just a win, doesn't that mean the bar's been lowered? o.O

cardsfan04 wrote:Oaklandblue wrote:DaDitka wrote:This tweet from JR and quote from Hitch says it all...Allen to play vs. SJ, Halak vs. ANA. Why Allen next? Hitchism: "Last year we rewarded shutouts. Now we're rewarding wins. Bar has changed."
If a shutout is a win without goals scored against us and a win is just a win, doesn't that mean the bar's been lowered? o.O
Nothing gets by you.





sseagle wrote:cprice12 wrote:sseagle wrote:abc789987 wrote:After the way the team plays with him in net, I hope he is here to stay. Can I trade Elliot for Allen in my sponsorship?
No some newb will grab him when the sponsor thread is started at 1:30 pm on a non game day
Next year you let me know when you will be online a week or so before the season starts and I'll be sure to create it then so it's the most convenient for you.
Meh no one want mine. I'm talking aboot the tarasenko disaster.
ViPeRx007 wrote:Still seems bizarre to me that we're talking about Halak and Elliott like they're scrap meat. A couple of months ago there were almost gods. I guess in this business the only thing that matters is the here and now, but it's still weird.


but the rest of the team needs to give the effort the whole game... soooo
They certainly seem to be playing a lot better in front of him however, there's just more energy. How long do you think they'll carry 3 goalies? Something's gotta give. BTW, Allen in goal again on Saturday.

KCFederko wrote:
There is no more energy in front of Allen than there has been in front of Halak or Elliott. The team had plenty of energy Tuesday in LA. Three fighting majors in the first and Backes was playing very physical. The two goals early in the third completely demoralized the team and they ended up getting outshot 15-4 for the period.
KCFederko wrote:You can probably carry three goalies and healthy scratch one for a couple weeks and if Allen is still playing well I think Elliott gets put on waivers, clears and gets sent to the minors to see if he can get his mojo back. I can't see a team placing a claim on a goalie with a $1.8M salary and a save percentage of .850 and if he does get claimed so be it as Allen would hopefully have proven he would at least be a capable backup for Halak.


Return to St. Louis Blues Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot] and 6 guests