Blues are the NHL's most efficient spenders

Discuss the St. Louis Blues, the NHL, or anything hockey.

Moderator: LGB Mods

Blues are the NHL's most efficient spenders

Postby dmiles2186 » Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:57 am

Short article proclaiming what most of us already know. Doug Armstrong is God.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/cap ... -spenders/

Among the many changes to the NHL after the lockout of 2005-06, none have had the impact of the implementation of a salary cap. As in any professional sport, some teams dole out their money more wisely than others. This season, those extremes are best embodied by the Carolina Hurricanes and St. Louis Blues.

NHL teams operate under a hard salary cap, meaning they are not permitted to devoted more than a set amount to roster salaries. Perhaps more importantly, there is also a salary floor, which requires each team to spend a certain amount of money every year to field a team. The more a team spends above the floor is significant since each dollar represents additional resources aimed at increasing their chance at winning a championship.

The Hurricanes, according to CapGeek.com, have committed more than $64 million to their NHL roster, including forwards Eric Staal ($8.3 million) and Alexander Semin ($7 million) along with netminder Cam Ward ($6.3 million). However, they sit well outside the playoff picture with a 30-30-9 record and, according to Las Vegas bookmakers, have less than a 1 percent chance at raising Lord Stanley’s Cup. In other words, the $20 million the Hurricanes spent above the cap floor barely edged them closer to their ultimate goal. In fact, based on their current spending and money management, they would have to commit $4 billion over the cap floor to guarantee a 100 percent chance at a championship.

That strictly theoretical number illustrates just how inefficient their spending has been this year and is perhaps a harbinger of things to come. They are not alone. The Winnipeg Jets have similar resources allocated with a comparable return on investment.

The Blues, on the other hand, are among the league’s most efficient spenders. Despite committing more than $17 million to blue-liners Jay Bouwmeester, Alex Pietrangelo and Kevin Shattenkirk, they have bargains among their forwards with David Backes ($4.5 million), T.J. Oshie ($4.2 million) and Patrik Berglund ($3.3 million). So despite committing virtually the same cap dollars as Carolina, the Blues will likely win the Presidents’ Trophy for tallying the most points in the league and are currently bookmakers’ favorite to win the Cup, with implied odds of 17 percent. If St. Louis was to “buy” a championship based on their spending efficiency, it would “cost” them just $120 million — just 3 percent of what the Hurricanes would require.

There are still games to be played, and a whole postseason ahead, but the Blues are positioned to succeed not only this year but for the immediate future as well. Doug Armstrong, the general manager of the Blues, won the NHL’s General Manager of the Year Award for his stewardship in 2010-11. Perhaps he should win one again.
Image
User avatar
dmiles2186
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 6200
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Selling Air Bombays--for kids who want to coach

Re: Blues are the NHL's most efficient spenders

Postby glen a richter » Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:22 pm

It helps that the team is so young. When it comes time to pay everyone what they've earned, who will be out? Retaining the exact core of this team is highly unlikely. Sad as it is to say, neither Oshie, Backes, Tarasenko, Schwartz, etc... are guaranteed to be with this team for their entire careers.
LGB sponsor of Ian Cole 2011-2012
LGB sponsor of Gary Bettman's Pink Slip 2013
LGB sponsor of Dmitrij Jaskin 2013-2014
LGB sponsor of Ian Cole (again) 2014-2015
glen a richter
Hockey God
Hockey God
 
Posts: 7492
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 8:02 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: Blues are the NHL's most efficient spenders

Postby xbleed83bluex » Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:49 pm

I think the management was very fortunate to sign Backes and Oshie to long term contracts when we did. That's why they're so cheap for us now. Could you imagine how expensive Oshie would be to re-sign if his contract expired this season? He'd be demanding more than Pietrangelo. Sometimes long-term contracts are a gamble, and in this case, we won.

We better take advantage of this while we can and win a cup this year or next, because we're not going to be able to have all these players at this deal for very long.
Official 2011-'12 sponsor of the hot chick from the FSMW Blues commercials.
User avatar
xbleed83bluex
2nd Line Scorer
2nd Line Scorer
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:26 pm


Return to St. Louis Blues Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], cardsfan04, Google [Bot], STLADOGG and 4 guests