Moderator: LGB Mods

execwrite wrote:I've changed my mind on trading players. Doubt the Blues will get into the playoff race although they are playing much better.
Of the five vets, I would trade Legace, Brewer and Rucinsky and try to re-sign Guerin and Tkachuk.
EJ can replace Brewer.
Sejna or Birner can replace Rucinksy.
Time to go with the kids in goal - Sanford, Cash, Schwarz.

execwrite wrote:Sejna or Birner can replace Rucinksy.

execwrite wrote:Time to go with the kids in goal - Sanford, Cash, Schwarz.

TC wrote:this week's Inside Hockey power rankings wrote:29. St. Louis Blues (29): Speculation that the Blues might climb
back into the playoff hunt is misguided. Like the Coyotes, this
team is a fire sale waiting to happen. And with goaltender Manny
Legace starting to heat up, teams on the bubble will begin
conjuring visions of him becoming this season's "Dwayne Roloson."
strocklen083 wrote:enough with the fire sale talk! This team is improved dramatically and they're starting to finally gel together. Why would you want to break that up by trading for a bunch of picks that won't be anything for at least another three years minimum.
I know i'm beating the dead horse here, but it just makes no sense at all! The only guy i'd be willing to trade is Brewer that is based on his pending free agency along with the arrival of EJ and the log jam we already have at the defensive position.
those guys at Inside Hockey don't have a clue what they're talking about. You know these guys aren't sitting down watching an entire Blues game. They're speculating based on stats sheets they read at nights end. Trading Manny at this point is the most absurd thing ever. why, after years of goaltending struggles would you trade a guy who over the past month has been one of the top 3 goalies in the league?
this is all nonsense. if we keep putting up performances like we have the past two weeks, we'll be right in the thick of this playoff race and considering the weakness of the division, we should have a better shot to leap frog all the guys out west that keep flip-flopping wins with each other
(note: i realize we're doing the same thing with Chicago, but Tuesday's game should have been a win. We all saw how 3 bad minutes can ruin a teams; effort. We should have gained 4 points on the Hawks, but i think this is all part of the growing process for this club)
Aode wrote:strocklen083 wrote:enough with the fire sale talk! This team is improved dramatically and they're starting to finally gel together. Why would you want to break that up by trading for a bunch of picks that won't be anything for at least another three years minimum.
I know i'm beating the dead horse here, but it just makes no sense at all! The only guy i'd be willing to trade is Brewer that is based on his pending free agency along with the arrival of EJ and the log jam we already have at the defensive position.
those guys at Inside Hockey don't have a clue what they're talking about. You know these guys aren't sitting down watching an entire Blues game. They're speculating based on stats sheets they read at nights end. Trading Manny at this point is the most absurd thing ever. why, after years of goaltending struggles would you trade a guy who over the past month has been one of the top 3 goalies in the league?
this is all nonsense. if we keep putting up performances like we have the past two weeks, we'll be right in the thick of this playoff race and considering the weakness of the division, we should have a better shot to leap frog all the guys out west that keep flip-flopping wins with each other
(note: i realize we're doing the same thing with Chicago, but Tuesday's game should have been a win. We all saw how 3 bad minutes can ruin a teams; effort. We should have gained 4 points on the Hawks, but i think this is all part of the growing process for this club)
I personally agree. The only players I would advocate trading (were it possible) would be Rucinsky and MAYBE Dvorak) Brewer is looking better, Legace is on fire, and you're right- we're pulling games down and making things happen. Luckily, we got almost 2 more months of hockey to further evaluate it and see if a playoff run is possible. If, by then, its not... well, trading at the deadline is never a great situation to be in, but its often necessary and beneficial if you aren't planning on pulling many of the guys back in the offseason.


BringBackZezel wrote:Some of you may read my quick statistical analysis of the Blues playoff chances posted here on December 20th:
http://www.letsgoblues.com/phpBB/viewto ... 897#412897
I decided to up date this since they've been hot recently.
Here are the results:
To be in the top 8 in the WC @ the trade deadline, they need to pick up an average of 1.727 points per game...which is more than what they had to average on Dec. 20 (1.62)
To be in the top 8 in the WC at the end of game 82, they need to pick up an average of 1.33 points per game. That is slightly less than the Dec. 20 average needed of 1.39....but still severely behind their current average of .825 points per game.
In short, they are further from being in the playoff picture as of the trade deadline, and only slightly closer overall.
What more is even if they win their next 10 consecutive games, they still would not be on pace to make the playoffs.

ledzeppelinfan1 wrote:BringBackZezel wrote:Some of you may read my quick statistical analysis of the Blues playoff chances posted here on December 20th:
http://www.letsgoblues.com/phpBB/viewto ... 897#412897
I decided to up date this since they've been hot recently.
Here are the results:
To be in the top 8 in the WC @ the trade deadline, they need to pick up an average of 1.727 points per game...which is more than what they had to average on Dec. 20 (1.62)
To be in the top 8 in the WC at the end of game 82, they need to pick up an average of 1.33 points per game. That is slightly less than the Dec. 20 average needed of 1.39....but still severely behind their current average of .825 points per game.
In short, they are further from being in the playoff picture as of the trade deadline, and only slightly closer overall.
What more is even if they win their next 10 consecutive games, they still would not be on pace to make the playoffs.
This analysis sucks ass.
First of all, if they won their next 10 games, they would likely be sitting right in the 8 or 9 spot...maybe higher...because they are already only 8 points or so out of a playoff spot at THIS moment, I would think a ten game winning streak would pretty much put them in a situation to say..."wow, with this momentum, we should make the playoffs...because we can do anything apparently."
In addition, with 42 games left they are just 8 points back. Anything can happen...
BTW 6-1-3 .750 1.5 PPG +5.8%


BringBackZezel wrote:you're both setting yourselves up to be greatly disappointed.
But hey, that's exactly what the Blues always do.

BringBackZezel wrote:execwrite wrote:I've changed my mind on trading players. Doubt the Blues will get into the playoff race although they are playing much better.
Of the five vets, I would trade Legace, Brewer and Rucinsky and try to re-sign Guerin and Tkachuk.
EJ can replace Brewer.
Sejna or Birner can replace Rucinksy.
Time to go with the kids in goal - Sanford, Cash, Schwarz.
Guerin and Tkachuk are UFAs at season's end.
The Blues aren't going to make the playoffs...why wouldn't you trade them for ANYTHING before the deadline, then resign them in the offseason (I'm not advocating resigning them, I'm simply saying that if you really want them for next year, you can still likely get a couple very good prospects for them)

execwrite wrote:Best record in the NHL over the past 10 games - St. Louis Blues
http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/standings

cprice12 wrote:BringBackZezel wrote:execwrite wrote:I've changed my mind on trading players. Doubt the Blues will get into the playoff race although they are playing much better.
Of the five vets, I would trade Legace, Brewer and Rucinsky and try to re-sign Guerin and Tkachuk.
EJ can replace Brewer.
Sejna or Birner can replace Rucinksy.
Time to go with the kids in goal - Sanford, Cash, Schwarz.
Guerin and Tkachuk are UFAs at season's end.
The Blues aren't going to make the playoffs...why wouldn't you trade them for ANYTHING before the deadline, then resign them in the offseason (I'm not advocating resigning them, I'm simply saying that if you really want them for next year, you can still likely get a couple very good prospects for them)
If you trade away players that fans like (Tkachuk, Guerin) in exchange for a gamble with prospects or picks, you'll tick off some of the fan base.
I'm not saying this is a bad move...just giving a reason why the organization might not dump players just to get ANYTHING for them.
But if they pull a Doug Weight and resign here...that's different and a win-win for the organization all around...assuming they don't make a playoff run.
But I wouldn't bank on the resign thing happening with Tkachuk or Guerin like it did with Weight....but you never know I guess.
Covenant wrote:It's been a couple years since the Wings have been shutout, and it certainly won't be broken by the lowly Blues.

BringBackZezel wrote:Some of you may read my quick statistical analysis of the Blues playoff chances posted here on December 20th:
http://www.letsgoblues.com/phpBB/viewto ... 897#412897
I decided to up date this since they've been hot recently.
Here are the results:
To be in the top 8 in the WC @ the trade deadline, they need to pick up an average of 1.727 points per game...which is more than what they had to average on Dec. 20 (1.62)
To be in the top 8 in the WC at the end of game 82, they need to pick up an average of 1.33 points per game. That is slightly less than the Dec. 20 average needed of 1.39....but still severely behind their current average of .825 points per game.
In short, they are further from being in the playoff picture as of the trade deadline, and only slightly closer overall.
What more is even if they win their next 10 consecutive games, they still would not be on pace to make the playoffs.





bamabluesfan wrote:What you also have to take into account is that the lack of attendence will most likely determine what they do. Without the revenues early in the season they will make every effort to generate revenues at the most profitable point the playoffs. Getting to the playoffs financially will strengthen the team not hurt it. Professional sports are a business, and if the team can minimize their losses this year with an eye towards generating more revenue next year they should do it. Ask Pittsburgh how it feels to have a team full of talented young players and going broke or Ottowa for that matter. Both teams in the recent past have been bankrupt, and regardless of revenue sharing etc the current owners of the blues dont have the deep pockets d|ckhead bill did.
Also getting to the playoffs or at least putting on a good show of going for it will draw more people in than a firesale of all the marketable names on the roster.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest